I tried to do a "yum install bind" and it said no packages found I then tried up2date bind and it installed bind for me. Is yum not completely setup correctly? Just thought th yum install bind would have worked also. I am using centos 4.3 x86_64. DNS was not selected as package to install when my system was built. Jerry
On 4/18/06, Jerry Geis <geisj at pagestation.com> wrote:> I tried to do a "yum install bind" and it said no packages found > I then tried up2date bind and it installed bind for me. > > Is yum not completely setup correctly? > Just thought th yum install bind would have worked also.Couple things here. 1. We don't know what you've done to yum, so there's no way to judge if you've screwed it up or not. Not enough detail to judge. 2. You're not using the proper package name for bind, up2date is just more braindead/forgiving about it. On RHEL/CentOS systems it's called 'named'. 3. Checking the yum documentation for 'yum search' or 'yum provides' or 'yum list available > list' etc would have showed you the resolution. -- Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. -Arthur C. Clarke
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 12:16, Jerry Geis wrote:> I tried to do a "yum install bind" and it said no packages found > I then tried up2date bind and it installed bind for me. > > Is yum not completely setup correctly? > Just thought th yum install bind would have worked also.If you remove the RPM for bind and try "yum install bind" again, does it fail? Have you changed the /etc/yum.* files in any way? I see no issue like this, so more information would be necessary to answer your question.> I am using centos 4.3 x86_64. DNS was not selected as package to install > when my system was built. > > Jerry > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >-- "The best way to predict the future is to invent it." - XEROX PARC slogan, circa 1978