On 23.7.2005, at 15:33, Cor Bosman wrote:
> RFC 3501 mentions this:
..> It is permitted to delete a name that has inferior hierarchical
> names and does not have the \Noselect mailbox name attribute. In
> this case, all messages in that mailbox are removed, and the name
> will acquire the \Noselect mailbox name attribute.
..> . list "" "*"
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "foo/bar"
..> Reading the above section, shouldnt I be seeing a:
>
> * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "foo"
If you do LIST "" %, you'll see "foo" as \NoSelect
folder. Maybe the
RFC tries to say that.
Anyway, I don't think there is any point to leave it as \NoSelect
folder. You can already create "foo/bar" directly, and CREATE
explanation doesn't require that "foo" must be shown as \NoSelect
with
LIST *. Besides, there is no way to create a \NoSelect folder with
Maildir++.
I'll anyway ask in imap list to make sure :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20050723/cb1fe2db/attachment-0001.bin>