On 22.10.2004, at 17:07, Jonathan Salomon wrote:
> I am sorry to bug you about this, but I am a bit confused and I have
> approx 200 users so I don't want to screw this up. I am using the
> latest
> FC2 Dovecot RPM: dovecot-0.99.10.5-0.FC2. I am using NFS to mount the
> /home dirs on the fileserver from the mailserver with mbox. In the docs
> you said that I should probably use :INDEX=MEMORY. However I think this
> really pushes the server to its limits with large mailboxes (I have
> sometimes loads of 8+!). Also I want to use mailaccounts that are
> shared
> by users (to multiple users acces the same mailbox simulateously). If I
> write the index file to a location on the filesystem, will this improve
> performance and still work with simultaneous logins? Should I upgrade
> to
> version 1.00.something because I read somewhere you rewrote the mbox
> functions?
1.0-tests perhaps aren't yet quite stable, but 0.99's mbox support
isn't fully stable either. You should be able to put indexes into local
disk just fine.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20041025/9d28b211/attachment-0001.bin>