Merb devel - Nov 2007 - Back to ruby2ruby?

Hello guys.

I missed a lot of the development before 0.4 got out (btw, excellent work!).

I checkout last night the merb-trunk code and run the specs, found
that everything passes with 1 pending, but no errors or failures about
missing ruby2ruby.

There is a ticket (#274)[1] that discuss this, but I remember we
discussed this back in September about depending on RubyInline...

Also, the merb gem dependencies didn''t state it, nor the documentation
as ticket mention...

ry dahl wrote a proof of concept extracting the count parameters part
of ParseTree, what happened to that?

Anyway, excellent progress and great looking site (still a few issues
with small fonts on Firefox ;-)

Regards,

[1] http://merb.devjavu.com/ticket/274
[2] http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/merb-devel/2007-September/000209.html

-- 
Luis Lavena
Multimedia systems
-
Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort,
which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that
is worthwhile.
Vince Lombardi

On Nov 8, 2007, at 7:04 AM, Luis Lavena wrote:
> I checkout last night the merb-trunk code and run the specs, found
> that everything passes with 1 pending, but no errors or failures about
> missing ruby2ruby.
It''s only required if you want to use parameterized actions.