I was wondering how i can get a list of arguments to evaluate within function call. I'd like to be able do something like this: #mod <- glm(y~1,data=df,family="binomial") opt <- list(family="binomial") mod <- glm(y~1,data=df,opt) Any idea how this can be done properly? TIA -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/pass-list-of-args-to-function-call-tp2305559p2305559.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Try this: do.call(glm, list(y ~ 1, data = df, family = 'binomial')) On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:23 PM, darckeen <darckeen@hotmail.com> wrote:> > I was wondering how i can get a list of arguments to evaluate within > function > call. I'd like to be able do something like this: > > > #mod <- glm(y~1,data=df,family="binomial") > > opt <- list(family="binomial") > mod <- glm(y~1,data=df,opt) > > > Any idea how this can be done properly? TIA > -- > View this message in context: > http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/pass-list-of-args-to-function-call-tp2305559p2305559.html > Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. >-- Henrique Dallazuanna Curitiba-Paraná-Brasil 25° 25' 40" S 49° 16' 22" O [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Thanks for your helpful response. I have a related question, i would like to further generalize the function by having the call arg of do.call function being referenced. Like this: model.fun <- glm model.opt <- list(y1~1,data=df,family="binomial") rslt <- do.call(model.fun,model.opt) This works but the model.fun object shows the code for glm. This is cumbersome in output, is there anyway to avoid this by having the model.fun be a reference/pointer to the glm function? TIA -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/pass-list-of-args-to-function-call-tp2305559p2305732.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Apparently Analagous Threads
- Estimating theta for negative binomial model
- glm.nb versus glm estimation of theta.
- Appropriate tests for logistic regression with a continuous predictor variable and Bernoulli response variable
- Curious finding in MASS:::confint.glm() tied to eval()
- monotonic factors