Rudi Ahlers
2008-Jul-11 11:40 UTC
[CentOS] looking for motherboard / temp / hdd monitor, other than lmsensors
Hi all What other good temp / motherboard / fan speed / HDD / etc monitor can I use on CentOS 5.1 (or even 5.2 - still need to upgrade)? I know lmsensors works ok'ish, but it doesn't pickup my Gigabyte motherboard properly. -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers CEO, SoftDux Web: http://www.SoftDux.com Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff, or visit http://www.WebHostingTalk.co.za for Web Hosting stuff
William L. Maltby
2008-Jul-12 13:47 UTC
[CentOS] looking for motherboard / temp / hdd monitor, other than lmsensors
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 13:40 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:> Hi all > > What other good temp / motherboard / fan speed / HDD / etc monitor can I > use on CentOS 5.1 (or even 5.2 - still need to upgrade)? I know > lmsensors works ok'ish, but it doesn't pickup my Gigabyte motherboard > properly.I don't know if it's good or what you want, but I use gkrellm $ rpm -qa|grep gkrel gkrellm-2.2.7-0.el5.rf.i386 It's in the rpmforge repo. It's highly configurable. I have a "minimalist" configuration. I've attached a snapshot.>-- Bill -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Gkrellm.png Type: image/png Size: 19808 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080712/28c864ff/attachment-0002.png>
Kai Schaetzl
2008-Jul-13 10:31 UTC
[CentOS] looking for motherboard / temp / hdd monitor, other than lmsensors
William L. Maltby wrote on Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:47:28 -0400:> I don't know if it's good or what you want, but I use gkrellmrelies on lm_sensors according to the homepage. (and sys_fs, AFAIK lm_sensors picks up sys_fs if it's available.) I'm having the same problems with lm_sensors with newer motherboards (ones from the last two years), some work, some don't. On some AMD motherboards it helps to "rmmod k8temp" to get a reading. On some it doesn't. I have one Intel board with I think Intel 5000X where lm_sensors also fails with a message like "no sys_fs" or so, I don't really remember. Do others know any tricks to get the data nevertheless? I think the kernel and lm_sensors on Centos 5 are simply too old for some chipsets. Also, there's sometimes a discrepancy between the support in the kernel and in lm_sensors. Kai -- Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com