Are now supported Samba Acls with ZFS? I am looking for information on the release notes of 3.0.24 version Samba, but I can''t see anything about ZFS and ACLs. Does anybody knows something? Thank you This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 04:07:25AM -0800, Rod wrote: Hello,> Are now supported Samba Acls with ZFS? > > I am looking for information on the release notes of 3.0.24 version Samba, > but I can''t see anything about ZFS and ACLs. > > Does anybody knows something?The code is in the svn repository: http://viewcvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/branches/SAMBA_3_0_25/source/modules/vfs_solarisacl.c?rev=21153&view=log But it isn''t in the 3.0.24 release. It seems that 3.0.24 is a security release, and that new features that were scheduled for 3.0.24 will be in 3.0.25. Greetings, Ivo De Decker
Op maandag 19 februari 2007 schreef Ivo De Decker:> The code is in the svn repository: > http://viewcvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/branches/SAMBA_3_0_25/source/m >odules/vfs_solarisacl.c?rev=21153&view=logThere is no ZFS ACL code in there, just UFS ACL stuff. Onno -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20070219/ccd041e6/attachment.bin>
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 03:43:49PM +0100, Rodrigo Ler?a wrote:> And when is going to be released 3.0.25 version?The samba-technical mailing list has more info: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2007-February/051430.html BTW this thread is also very interesting for ZFS users: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2007-February/051506.html Greetings, Ivo De Decker
On 2/19/07, Rod <rleria at gmail.com> wrote:> Are now supported Samba Acls with ZFS? > > I am looking for information on the release notes of 3.0.24 version Samba, but I can''t see anything about ZFS and ACLs. > > Does anybody knows something?It''s not there yet. I spent some time looking at this a few weeks ago, and last I looked there was a Sun engineer on the SFW team working on ZFS ACL support, who said he''d have something "in two or three weeks." That was several weeks ago, and I haven''t looked into it beyond a quick glance since. One thing I did try out was loopback mounting the filesystem via NFS and exporting /that/ with Samba, which seemed to work fine as far as getting/setting ACLs via Explorer. That is clearly not an optimal solution, however, and I decided that I could live with the real permissions being invisible. -- Eric Enright
Thank you gro your answers, but I have another question. If I don''t use any special ACL with Samba and ZFS, only each user can write and read from his home directory. I am affected with the incompatibility? Thank you again. Rod 2007/2/19, Eric Enright <eric.enright at gmail.com>:> On 2/19/07, Rod <rleria at gmail.com> wrote: > > Are now supported Samba Acls with ZFS? > > > > I am looking for information on the release notes of 3.0.24 version Samba, but I can''t see anything about ZFS and ACLs. > > > > Does anybody knows something? > > It''s not there yet. I spent some time looking at this a few weeks > ago, and last I looked there was a Sun engineer on the SFW team > working on ZFS ACL support, who said he''d have something "in two or > three weeks." That was several weeks ago, and I haven''t looked into > it beyond a quick glance since. > > One thing I did try out was loopback mounting the filesystem via NFS > and exporting /that/ with Samba, which seemed to work fine as far as > getting/setting ACLs via Explorer. That is clearly not an optimal > solution, however, and I decided that I could live with the real > permissions being invisible. > > -- > Eric Enright >-- **************************************** Rodrigo Ler?a http://www.preparatuviaje.com *****************************************
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:21:27AM +0100, Rodrigo Ler?a wrote:> If I don''t use any special ACL with Samba and ZFS, only each user can > write and read from his home directory. I am affected with the > incompatibility?Samba runs as the requesting user during file access. Because of that, any file permissions or ACLs are respected even if Samba doesn''t have support for the ACLs. The main thing that Samba support for ZFS ACLs will bring is the ability to view and set the ACLs from a Windows client and in particular through the normal Windows ACL GUI. Ed Plese
Thank you very much for your answer. It is very userful for me. Thank you 2007/2/21, Ed Plese <ed at edplese.com>:> On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:21:27AM +0100, Rodrigo Ler?a wrote: > > If I don''t use any special ACL with Samba and ZFS, only each user can > > write and read from his home directory. I am affected with the > > incompatibility? > > Samba runs as the requesting user during file access. Because of that, > any file permissions or ACLs are respected even if Samba doesn''t have > support for the ACLs. The main thing that Samba support for ZFS ACLs > will bring is the ability to view and set the ACLs from a Windows client > and in particular through the normal Windows ACL GUI. > > > Ed Plese >-- **************************************** Rodrigo Ler?a http://www.preparatuviaje.com *****************************************
I am currently working (among the other problems) on this issue. I hope the module will be finished till the 3.0.25 will be released. This message posted from opensolaris.org