On Coraids (Inventor of AoE) website, they claim the?r drivers will also work on Solaris. So my question is: Will there be any technical limitations regarding implementation of ZFS and AoE ? If not yet possible, the developers of OpenSolaris might consider this option as a natural step I guess. What do You people think ? With cheap disk attachments over an ethernet, and with ZFS, I think Solaris will become very competitive. Just my Cents, have a nice weekend out there. Br, Daniel Mersebak This message posted from opensolaris.org
Richard Elling - PAE
2005-Nov-18 17:01 UTC
[zfs-discuss] ZFS ATA over Ethernet and OpenSolaris
Daniel Mersebak wrote:> On Coraids (Inventor of AoE) website, they claim the?r drivers will also work > on Solaris.cool!> So my question is: Will there be any technical limitations regarding > implementation of ZFS and AoE ?Limitation? I don''t think so. As long as they provide a block storage device, ZFS will be happy.> If not yet possible, the developers of OpenSolaris might consider this > option as a natural step I guess. What do You people think ?I think it will have a short life. Since the protocol does not run over IP, it will not have the features provided by IP, which many people find very useful (routing, multipathing, IPsec, NAT, DHCP, etc.) Meanwhile, the "high protocol overhead" of IP is largely myth. Actually, I thought that myth died with Netware...> With cheap disk attachments over an ethernet, and with ZFS, I think > Solaris will become very competitive.Actually, I think that without ZFS, AoE will have an even shorter life. All it takes is one data corruption due to something along the wire and you''re toast. ZFS can at least detect these and at most will recover gracefully. Note: I haven''t studied the ATA protocol, but I seriously doubt that it assumes an unreliable transport -- which all networks are. If the AoE driver implementation does automated retries and congestion control, then they have reinvented parts of TCP/IP or iSCSI. -- richard