Mukesh Rathor
2013-Nov-22 01:00 UTC
[PATCH] pvh: change epte_get_entry_emt() for pvh mem types
For pvh guests, epte_get_entry_emt() is incorrectly returning WB for all mem types because of the following check: if ( !v->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_IDENT_PT] ) Skip the check for pvh guests. Also note, MTRR ranges are not maintained for pvh, and a solution is being contrived using PAT. Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> --- xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c | 7 ++++++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c index 4ff1e55..5427e1c 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c @@ -693,7 +693,8 @@ uint8_t epte_get_entry_emt(struct domain *d, unsigned long gfn, mfn_t mfn, ((d->vcpu == NULL) || ((v = d->vcpu[0]) == NULL)) ) return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; - if ( !v->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_IDENT_PT] ) + if ( !is_pvh_vcpu(v) && + !v->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_IDENT_PT] ) return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; if ( !mfn_valid(mfn_x(mfn)) ) @@ -717,6 +718,10 @@ uint8_t epte_get_entry_emt(struct domain *d, unsigned long gfn, mfn_t mfn, return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; } + /* MTRR ranges are not maintained for pvh. */ + if ( is_pvh_vcpu(v) ) + return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; + gmtrr_mtype = get_mtrr_type(&v->arch.hvm_vcpu.mtrr, (gfn << PAGE_SHIFT)); hmtrr_mtype = get_mtrr_type(&mtrr_state, (mfn_x(mfn) << PAGE_SHIFT)); return ((gmtrr_mtype <= hmtrr_mtype) ? gmtrr_mtype : hmtrr_mtype); -- 1.7.2.3
George Dunlap
2013-Nov-22 10:52 UTC
Re: [PATCH] pvh: change epte_get_entry_emt() for pvh mem types
On 22/11/13 01:00, Mukesh Rathor wrote:> For pvh guests, epte_get_entry_emt() is incorrectly returning WB for > all mem types because of the following check: > if ( !v->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_IDENT_PT] ) > Skip the check for pvh guests. > > Also note, MTRR ranges are not maintained for pvh, and a solution is > being contrived using PAT. > > Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> > --- > xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c > index 4ff1e55..5427e1c 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c > @@ -693,7 +693,8 @@ uint8_t epte_get_entry_emt(struct domain *d, unsigned long gfn, mfn_t mfn, > ((d->vcpu == NULL) || ((v = d->vcpu[0]) == NULL)) ) > return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; > > - if ( !v->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_IDENT_PT] ) > + if ( !is_pvh_vcpu(v) && > + !v->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_IDENT_PT] ) > return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; > > if ( !mfn_valid(mfn_x(mfn)) ) > @@ -717,6 +718,10 @@ uint8_t epte_get_entry_emt(struct domain *d, unsigned long gfn, mfn_t mfn, > return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; > } > > + /* MTRR ranges are not maintained for pvh. */ > + if ( is_pvh_vcpu(v) ) > + return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; > + > gmtrr_mtype = get_mtrr_type(&v->arch.hvm_vcpu.mtrr, (gfn << PAGE_SHIFT)); > hmtrr_mtype = get_mtrr_type(&mtrr_state, (mfn_x(mfn) << PAGE_SHIFT)); > return ((gmtrr_mtype <= hmtrr_mtype) ? gmtrr_mtype : hmtrr_mtype);So this will bypass the host mtrr settings, and always return WRBACK, even if in mtrr_state it was set to something lower. Presumably that "min(host,guest)" was there for a reason. Are you sure it''s safe to just ignore it? This is why I suggested the following instead: gmtrr_mtype = is_hvm_domain(v) ? get_mtrr_type(&v->arch.hvm_vcpu.mtrr, (gfn << PAGE_SHIFT)) : MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; -George
George Dunlap
2013-Nov-22 11:03 UTC
Re: [PATCH] pvh: change epte_get_entry_emt() for pvh mem types
On 22/11/13 10:52, George Dunlap wrote:> On 22/11/13 01:00, Mukesh Rathor wrote: >> For pvh guests, epte_get_entry_emt() is incorrectly returning WB for >> all mem types because of the following check: >> if ( !v->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_IDENT_PT] ) >> Skip the check for pvh guests. >> >> Also note, MTRR ranges are not maintained for pvh, and a solution is >> being contrived using PAT. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> >> --- >> xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c | 7 ++++++- >> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c >> index 4ff1e55..5427e1c 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c >> @@ -693,7 +693,8 @@ uint8_t epte_get_entry_emt(struct domain *d, >> unsigned long gfn, mfn_t mfn, >> ((d->vcpu == NULL) || ((v = d->vcpu[0]) == NULL)) ) >> return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; >> - if ( !v->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_IDENT_PT] ) >> + if ( !is_pvh_vcpu(v) && >> + !v->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_IDENT_PT] ) >> return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; >> if ( !mfn_valid(mfn_x(mfn)) ) >> @@ -717,6 +718,10 @@ uint8_t epte_get_entry_emt(struct domain *d, >> unsigned long gfn, mfn_t mfn, >> return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; >> } >> + /* MTRR ranges are not maintained for pvh. */ >> + if ( is_pvh_vcpu(v) ) >> + return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; >> + >> gmtrr_mtype = get_mtrr_type(&v->arch.hvm_vcpu.mtrr, (gfn << >> PAGE_SHIFT)); >> hmtrr_mtype = get_mtrr_type(&mtrr_state, (mfn_x(mfn) << >> PAGE_SHIFT)); >> return ((gmtrr_mtype <= hmtrr_mtype) ? gmtrr_mtype : hmtrr_mtype); > > So this will bypass the host mtrr settings, and always return WRBACK, > even if in mtrr_state it was set to something lower. Presumably that > "min(host,guest)" was there for a reason. Are you sure it''s safe to > just ignore it? > > This is why I suggested the following instead: > > gmtrr_mtype = is_hvm_domain(v) ? > get_mtrr_type(&v->arch.hvm_vcpu.mtrr, (gfn << PAGE_SHIFT)) : > MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK;Also, while I suppose this is fine for now (since we''re starting the code freeze), for the future: is it actually better to "bake in" that MTRRs are completely disabled and always effectively return WRBACK (except for direct_mmio memory), or would it be better to initialize the virtual MTRRs to WRBACK (the way a BIOS would), and allow the guest to change them if it wants? -George
Jan Beulich
2013-Nov-22 12:05 UTC
Re: [PATCH] pvh: change epte_get_entry_emt() for pvh mem types
>>> On 22.11.13 at 11:52, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote: > On 22/11/13 01:00, Mukesh Rathor wrote: >> For pvh guests, epte_get_entry_emt() is incorrectly returning WB for >> all mem types because of the following check: >> if ( !v->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_IDENT_PT] ) >> Skip the check for pvh guests. >> >> Also note, MTRR ranges are not maintained for pvh, and a solution is >> being contrived using PAT. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> >> --- >> xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c | 7 ++++++- >> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c >> index 4ff1e55..5427e1c 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c >> @@ -693,7 +693,8 @@ uint8_t epte_get_entry_emt(struct domain *d, unsigned > long gfn, mfn_t mfn, >> ((d->vcpu == NULL) || ((v = d->vcpu[0]) == NULL)) ) >> return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; >> >> - if ( !v->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_IDENT_PT] ) >> + if ( !is_pvh_vcpu(v) && >> + !v->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_IDENT_PT] ) >> return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; >> >> if ( !mfn_valid(mfn_x(mfn)) ) >> @@ -717,6 +718,10 @@ uint8_t epte_get_entry_emt(struct domain *d, unsigned > long gfn, mfn_t mfn, >> return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; >> } >> >> + /* MTRR ranges are not maintained for pvh. */ >> + if ( is_pvh_vcpu(v) ) >> + return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; >> + >> gmtrr_mtype = get_mtrr_type(&v->arch.hvm_vcpu.mtrr, (gfn << PAGE_SHIFT)); >> hmtrr_mtype = get_mtrr_type(&mtrr_state, (mfn_x(mfn) << PAGE_SHIFT)); >> return ((gmtrr_mtype <= hmtrr_mtype) ? gmtrr_mtype : hmtrr_mtype); > > So this will bypass the host mtrr settings, and always return WRBACK, > even if in mtrr_state it was set to something lower. Presumably that > "min(host,guest)" was there for a reason. Are you sure it''s safe to > just ignore it? > > This is why I suggested the following instead: > > gmtrr_mtype = is_hvm_domain(v) ? > get_mtrr_type(&v->arch.hvm_vcpu.mtrr, (gfn << PAGE_SHIFT)) : > MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK;Indeed, that''s what we should use. Jan
Mukesh Rathor
2013-Nov-22 20:40 UTC
Re: [PATCH] pvh: change epte_get_entry_emt() for pvh mem types
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:05:03 +0000 "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:> >>> On 22.11.13 at 11:52, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> > >>> wrote: > > On 22/11/13 01:00, Mukesh Rathor wrote: > >> For pvh guests, epte_get_entry_emt() is incorrectly returning WB > >> for all mem types because of the following check: > >> if ( !v->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_IDENT_PT] ) > >> Skip the check for pvh guests. > >> > >> Also note, MTRR ranges are not maintained for pvh, and a solution > >> is being contrived using PAT. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> > >> --- > >> xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c | 7 ++++++- > >> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c > >> index 4ff1e55..5427e1c 100644 > >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c > >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c > >> @@ -693,7 +693,8 @@ uint8_t epte_get_entry_emt(struct domain *d, > >> unsigned > > long gfn, mfn_t mfn, > >> ((d->vcpu == NULL) || ((v = d->vcpu[0]) == NULL)) ) > >> return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; > >> > >> - if ( !v->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_IDENT_PT] ) > >> + if ( !is_pvh_vcpu(v) && > >> + !v->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_IDENT_PT] ) > >> return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; > >> > >> if ( !mfn_valid(mfn_x(mfn)) ) > >> @@ -717,6 +718,10 @@ uint8_t epte_get_entry_emt(struct domain *d, > >> unsigned > > long gfn, mfn_t mfn, > >> return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; > >> } > >> > >> + /* MTRR ranges are not maintained for pvh. */ > >> + if ( is_pvh_vcpu(v) ) > >> + return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; > >> + > >> gmtrr_mtype = get_mtrr_type(&v->arch.hvm_vcpu.mtrr, (gfn << > >> PAGE_SHIFT)); hmtrr_mtype = get_mtrr_type(&mtrr_state, (mfn_x(mfn) > >> << PAGE_SHIFT)); return ((gmtrr_mtype <= hmtrr_mtype) ? > >> gmtrr_mtype : hmtrr_mtype); > > > > So this will bypass the host mtrr settings, and always return > > WRBACK, even if in mtrr_state it was set to something lower. > > Presumably that "min(host,guest)" was there for a reason. Are you > > sure it''s safe to just ignore it? > > > > This is why I suggested the following instead: > > > > gmtrr_mtype = is_hvm_domain(v) ? > > get_mtrr_type(&v->arch.hvm_vcpu.mtrr, (gfn << > > PAGE_SHIFT)) : MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK; > > Indeed, that''s what we should use.Sorry, totally my bad. For some reason I had concluded that hmtrr_mtype was being set to UC. V2 patch on the way... thanks Mukesh