David Vrabel
2013-Jun-27 10:35 UTC
[PATCH 2/5] time: pass flags instead of multiple bools to timekeeping_update()
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Instead of passing multiple bools to timekeeping_updated(), define
flags and use a single ''action'' parameter. It is then more
obvious
what each timekeeping_update() call does.
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index baeeb5c..7aed2b0 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
#include "tick-internal.h"
#include "ntp_internal.h"
+#define TK_CLEAR_NTP (1 << 0)
+#define TK_MIRROR (1 << 1)
+
static struct timekeeper timekeeper;
static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(timekeeper_lock);
static seqcount_t timekeeper_seq;
@@ -241,16 +244,16 @@ int pvclock_gtod_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block
*nb)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pvclock_gtod_unregister_notifier);
/* must hold timekeeper_lock */
-static void timekeeping_update(struct timekeeper *tk, bool clearntp, bool
mirror)
+static void timekeeping_update(struct timekeeper *tk, unsigned action)
{
- if (clearntp) {
+ if (action & TK_CLEAR_NTP) {
tk->ntp_error = 0;
ntp_clear();
}
update_vsyscall(tk);
update_pvclock_gtod(tk);
- if (mirror)
+ if (action & TK_MIRROR)
memcpy(&shadow_timekeeper, &timekeeper, sizeof(timekeeper));
}
@@ -508,7 +511,7 @@ int do_settimeofday(const struct timespec *tv)
tk_set_xtime(tk, tv);
- timekeeping_update(tk, true, true);
+ timekeeping_update(tk, TK_CLEAR_NTP | TK_MIRROR);
write_seqcount_end(&timekeeper_seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
@@ -552,7 +555,7 @@ int timekeeping_inject_offset(struct timespec *ts)
tk_set_wall_to_mono(tk, timespec_sub(tk->wall_to_monotonic, *ts));
error: /* even if we error out, we forwarded the time, so call update */
- timekeeping_update(tk, true, true);
+ timekeeping_update(tk, TK_CLEAR_NTP | TK_MIRROR);
write_seqcount_end(&timekeeper_seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
@@ -633,7 +636,7 @@ static int change_clocksource(void *data)
if (old->disable)
old->disable(old);
}
- timekeeping_update(tk, true, true);
+ timekeeping_update(tk, TK_CLEAR_NTP | TK_MIRROR);
write_seqcount_end(&timekeeper_seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
@@ -872,7 +875,7 @@ void timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(struct timespec *delta)
__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(tk, delta);
- timekeeping_update(tk, true, true);
+ timekeeping_update(tk, TK_CLEAR_NTP | TK_MIRROR);
write_seqcount_end(&timekeeper_seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
@@ -954,7 +957,7 @@ static void timekeeping_resume(void)
tk->cycle_last = clock->cycle_last = cycle_now;
tk->ntp_error = 0;
timekeeping_suspended = 0;
- timekeeping_update(tk, false, true);
+ timekeeping_update(tk, TK_MIRROR);
write_seqcount_end(&timekeeper_seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
@@ -1415,7 +1418,7 @@ static void update_wall_time(void)
* updating.
*/
memcpy(real_tk, tk, sizeof(*tk));
- timekeeping_update(real_tk, false, false);
+ timekeeping_update(real_tk, 0);
write_seqcount_end(&timekeeper_seq);
out:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
--
1.7.2.5
John Stultz
2013-Jun-27 17:39 UTC
Re: [PATCH 2/5] time: pass flags instead of multiple bools to timekeeping_update()
On 06/27/2013 03:35 AM, David Vrabel wrote:> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> > > Instead of passing multiple bools to timekeeping_updated(), define > flags and use a single ''action'' parameter. It is then more obvious > what each timekeeping_update() call does. > > Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> > --- > kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- > 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c > index baeeb5c..7aed2b0 100644 > --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c > +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c > @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ > #include "tick-internal.h" > #include "ntp_internal.h" > > +#define TK_CLEAR_NTP (1 << 0) > +#define TK_MIRROR (1 << 1) > + > static struct timekeeper timekeeper; > static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(timekeeper_lock); > static seqcount_t timekeeper_seq; > @@ -241,16 +244,16 @@ int pvclock_gtod_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb) > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pvclock_gtod_unregister_notifier); > > /* must hold timekeeper_lock */ > -static void timekeeping_update(struct timekeeper *tk, bool clearntp, bool mirror) > +static void timekeeping_update(struct timekeeper *tk, unsigned action)Nit: Mind making this "unsigned int" just for consistency sake with the rest of the code? thanks -john
Reasonably Related Threads
- [PATCH 2/4] time: add a notifier chain for when the system time is stepped
- [RFC][PATCH 2/5] timekeeping: Fix potential lost pv notification of time change
- [RFC][PATCH 3/3] timekeeping: Fix potential lost pv notification of time change
- [RFC v4 02/12] kthread: Add kthread_(un)block_work_queuing() and kthread_work_queuable()
- Patch "genirq: Add IRQF_RESUME_EARLY and resume such IRQs earlier" has been added to the 3.1-stable tree