flight 17724 xen-4.1-testing real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17724/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 17718
build-amd64 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 17718
build-i386-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 17718
build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 17718
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
build-armhf 4 xen-build fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-i386-i386-pv 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-i386-i386-xl 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-pv 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-pair 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-pair 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-i386-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-pv 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-i386-i386-xl-winxpsp3 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-i386-i386-pair 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-i386-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
version targeted for testing:
xen 21c31a811ca1705b71417fab520d9b39ae2ab3a7
baseline version:
xen f4537b51116009bfb8359681a758ef5860cfd0db
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
Marek Marczykowski <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
jobs:
build-amd64 fail
build-armhf fail
build-i386 fail
build-amd64-oldkern fail
build-i386-oldkern fail
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl blocked
test-i386-i386-xl blocked
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd blocked
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd blocked
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel blocked
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel blocked
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel blocked
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu blocked
test-amd64-amd64-pair blocked
test-amd64-i386-pair blocked
test-i386-i386-pair blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin blocked
test-amd64-amd64-pv blocked
test-amd64-i386-pv blocked
test-i386-i386-pv blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 blocked
test-i386-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 blocked
test-i386-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 blocked
test-i386-i386-xl-winxpsp3 blocked
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com
logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs
images: /home/xc_osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Not pushing.
------------------------------------------------------------
commit 21c31a811ca1705b71417fab520d9b39ae2ab3a7
Author: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Date: Thu Apr 18 17:44:17 2013 +0100
libxl: Fix SEGV in network-attach
When "device/vif" directory exists but is empty l!=NULL, but
nb==0, so
l[nb-1] is invalid. Add missing check.
Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9f1a6ff38b8e7bb97a016794115de28553a6559f)
Conflicts:
tools/libxl/libxl.c
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
commit a12ed396652c22988e0e7a3f5bd57c882872da8e
Author: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
Date: Thu Apr 18 17:38:17 2013 +0200
Fix rcu domain locking for transitive grants
When acquiring a transitive grant for copy then the owning domain
needs to be locked down as well as the granting domain. This was being
done, but the unlocking was not. The acquire code now stores the
struct domain * of the owning domain (rather than the domid) in the
active entry in the granting domain. The release code then does the
unlock on the owning domain. Note that I believe I also fixed a bug
where, for non-transitive grants the active entry contained a
reference to the acquiring domain rather than the granting
domain. From my reading of the code this would stop the release code
for transitive grants from terminating its recursion correctly.
Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
master commit: f544bf377ee829e1342abd818ac30478c6f3a134
master date: 2011-03-08 16:30:30 +0000
Also, for non-transitive grants we now avoid incorrectly recursing
in __release_grant_for_copy.
This is CVE-2013-1964 / XSA-50.
Reported-by: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Tested-by: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
commit d3d1288618ec903ad6a0e994ddfe0975cbac1584
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Date: Thu Apr 18 16:24:08 2013 +0200
x86: fix various issues with handling guest IRQs
- properly revoke IRQ access in map_domain_pirq() error path
- don''t permit replacing an in use IRQ
- don''t accept inputs in the GSI range for MAP_PIRQ_TYPE_MSI
- track IRQ access permission in host IRQ terms, not guest IRQ ones
(and with that, also disallow Dom0 access to IRQ0)
This is CVE-2013-1919 / XSA-46.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
master commit: 545607eb3cfeb2abf5742d1bb869734f317fcfe5
master date: 2013-04-18 16:11:23 +0200
commit 584eb7c15e4c94baaba93468776572dd7373a33c
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Date: Thu Apr 18 16:23:07 2013 +0200
x86: clear EFLAGS.NT in SYSENTER entry path
... as it causes problems if we happen to exit back via IRET: In the
course of trying to handle the fault, the hypervisor creates a stack
frame by hand, and uses PUSHFQ to set the respective EFLAGS field, but
expects to be able to IRET through that stack frame to the second
portion of the fixup code (which causes a #GP due to the stored EFLAGS
having NT set).
And even if this worked (e.g if we cleared NT in that path), it would
then (through the fail safe callback) cause a #GP in the guest with the
SYSENTER handler''s first instruction as the source, which in turn
would
allow guest user mode code to crash the guest kernel.
Inject a #GP on the fake (NULL) address of the SYSENTER instruction
instead, just like in the case where the guest kernel didn''t
register
a corresponding entry point.
On 32-bit we also need to make sure we clear SYSENTER_CS for all CPUs
(neither #RESET nor #INIT guarantee this).
This is CVE-2013-1917 / XSA-44.
Reported-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citirx.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
master commit: fdac9515607b757c044e7ef0d61b1453ef999b08
master date: 2013-04-18 16:00:35 +0200
(qemu changes not included)