Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-May-31 15:39 UTC
Re: Status of devel/netback.liu.v5.on.3.5 branch
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:39:30PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:> Hi Konrad, > > What is the status of the "devel/netback.liu.v5.on.3.5" branch in your tree ?Hm, lets wrap Ian and CC in this converstation. Were there any big outstanding TODOs before the network maintainer was OK with them?> It doesn''t seem to be destined for 3.5 mainline yet ? > > > -- > Sander
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 16:39 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:39:30PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > > Hi Konrad, > > > > What is the status of the "devel/netback.liu.v5.on.3.5" branch in your tree ? > > Hm, lets wrap Ian and CC in this converstation. Were there > any big outstanding TODOs before the network maintainer > was OK with them?IIRC all of Wei''s patches were RFC and not yet intended for upstreaming yet, there was other work we wanted to do first to validate and round out the ideas started by those patches before committing to them..> > It doesn''t seem to be destined for 3.5 mainline yet ?No it isn''t. This is a branch containing some development patches which Wei sent out, it''s not even Wei''s own development branch. Ian.
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-May-31 16:12 UTC
Re: Status of devel/netback.liu.v5.on.3.5 branch
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:52:35PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:> On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 16:39 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:39:30PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > > > Hi Konrad, > > > > > > What is the status of the "devel/netback.liu.v5.on.3.5" branch in your tree ? > > > > Hm, lets wrap Ian and CC in this converstation. Were there > > any big outstanding TODOs before the network maintainer > > was OK with them? > > IIRC all of Wei''s patches were RFC and not yet intended for upstreaming > yet, there was other work we wanted to do first to validate and round > out the ideas started by those patches before committing to them.. > > > > It doesn''t seem to be destined for 3.5 mainline yet ? > > No it isn''t. > > This is a branch containing some development patches which Wei sent out, > it''s not even Wei''s own development branch.Where is his git tree?> > Ian. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 17:12 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:52:35PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 16:39 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:39:30PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > > > > Hi Konrad, > > > > > > > > What is the status of the "devel/netback.liu.v5.on.3.5" branch in your tree ? > > > > > > Hm, lets wrap Ian and CC in this converstation. Were there > > > any big outstanding TODOs before the network maintainer > > > was OK with them? > > > > IIRC all of Wei''s patches were RFC and not yet intended for upstreaming > > yet, there was other work we wanted to do first to validate and round > > out the ideas started by those patches before committing to them.. > > > > > > It doesn''t seem to be destined for 3.5 mainline yet ? > > > > No it isn''t. > > > > This is a branch containing some development patches which Wei sent out, > > it''s not even Wei''s own development branch. > > Where is his git tree? > >Not sure, he''s not here right now. When this stuff is ready for upstream it will be posted. Ian.
Maybe Matching Threads
- xennet: skb rides the rocket: 20 slots
- xen-unstable: commit commit 63753b3e0dc56efb1acf94fa46f3fee7bc59281c leaves HVM guest dangling after shutdown or destroy.
- 2.6.39 dom0 xen power management test
- [PATCH] xen/pvhvm: If xen_platform_pci=0 is set don''t blow up.
- 3.8.0-rc0 on xen-unstable: RCU Stall during boot as dom0 kernel after IOAPIC