Hi all!
Did the nested xen stuff make it into the xen-unstable (4.1-rc1?) tree as
suggested back in January by Tim Deegan?
TIA
________________________________
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:01:12 +0000
From: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] Nested Virtualization: Overview
To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com"
<xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, "Dong, Eddie"
<eddie.dong@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20110107160112.GC5651@whitby.uk.xensource.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi,
At 16:02 +0000 on 20 Dec (1292860962), Christoph Egger
wrote:> This patch series brings Nested Virtualization to Xen.
> This is the seventh patch series.
Thanks for this. I''ve commented on patch 4 (core) and patch 12
(hap-on-hap) separately. Also I think we need an Acked-by: from Eddie
for patches 1-8.
Apart from that I think we can check these in as soon as the 4.1
branch has been taken, and fix up any remaining issues in-tree.
Cheers,
Tim.
--
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
Principal Software Engineer, Xen Platform Team
Citrix Systems UK Ltd. (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 18/02/2011 02:44, "domiel forty-two" <domiel42@yahoo.com.au> wrote:> Hi all! > > Did the nested xen stuff make it into the xen-unstable (4.1-rc1?) tree as > suggested back in January by Tim Deegan?Tim meant that the patches may be applied to xen-unstable after 4.1 is branched from it. I.e., they are candidates for 4.2, not 4.1. -- Keir> TIA > > > Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:01:12 +0000 > From: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] Nested Virtualization: Overview > To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com> > Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" > <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com> > Message-ID: <20110107160112.GC5651@whitby.uk.xensource.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi, > > At 16:02 +0000 on 20 Dec (1292860962), Christoph Egger wrote: >> This patch series brings Nested Virtualization to Xen. >> This is the seventh patch series. > > Thanks for this. I''ve commented on patch 4 (core) and patch 12 > (hap-on-hap) separately. Also I think we need an Acked-by: from Eddie > for patches 1-8. > > Apart from that I think we can check these in as soon as the 4.1 > branch has been taken, and fix up any remaining issues in-tree. > > Cheers, > > Tim._______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
domiel forty-two
2011-Feb-18 08:01 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85
Keir, Thanks for the clarification. D. ________________________________ From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org> To: domiel forty-two <domiel42@yahoo.com.au>; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Sent: Fri, 18 February, 2011 6:08:05 PM Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85 On 18/02/2011 02:44, "domiel forty-two" <domiel42@yahoo.com.au> wrote:> Hi all! > > Did the nested xen stuff make it into the xen-unstable (4.1-rc1?) tree as > suggested back in January by Tim Deegan?Tim meant that the patches may be applied to xen-unstable after 4.1 is branched from it. I.e., they are candidates for 4.2, not 4.1. -- Keir> TIA > > > Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:01:12 +0000 > From: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] Nested Virtualization: Overview > To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com> > Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" > <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com> > Message-ID: <20110107160112.GC5651@whitby.uk.xensource.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi, > > At 16:02 +0000 on 20 Dec (1292860962), Christoph Egger wrote: >> This patch series brings Nested Virtualization to Xen. >> This is the seventh patch series. > > Thanks for this. I''ve commented on patch 4 (core) and patch 12 > (hap-on-hap) separately. Also I think we need an Acked-by: from Eddie > for patches 1-8. > > Apart from that I think we can check these in as soon as the 4.1 > branch has been taken, and fix up any remaining issues in-tree. > > Cheers, > > Tim._______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel