Dong, Eddie
2010-Sep-15 14:34 UTC
[Xen-devel] A simple clean up of __get_instruction_length & __update_guest_eip
Replace so many sparsed __get_instruction_length & __update_guest_eip with
one function call.
Signed-off-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
diff -r 221cf46cbf2c xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c Wed Sep 15 17:31:53 2010 +0800
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c Wed Sep 15 17:46:24 2010 +0800
@@ -1494,6 +1494,14 @@
vmx_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_debug, HVM_DELIVER_NO_ERROR_CODE);
}
+static void update_guest_eip(void)
+{
+ unsigned long inst_len;
+
+ inst_len = __get_instruction_length();
+ __update_guest_eip(inst_len);
+}
+
static void vmx_fpu_dirty_intercept(void)
{
struct vcpu *curr = current;
@@ -2244,8 +2252,7 @@
if ( (((exit_qualification >> 12) & 0xf) == 1) &&
((exit_qualification & 0xfff) == APIC_EOI) )
{
- int inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: APIC data write */
- __update_guest_eip(inst_len);
+ update_guest_eip();
vlapic_EOI_set(vcpu_vlapic(current));
return 1;
}
@@ -2424,8 +2431,7 @@
case TRAP_int3:
if ( !v->domain->debugger_attached )
goto exit_and_crash;
- inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: INT3 */
- __update_guest_eip(inst_len);
+ update_guest_eip();
current->arch.gdbsx_vcpu_event = TRAP_int3;
domain_pause_for_debugger();
break;
@@ -2516,18 +2522,15 @@
break;
}
case EXIT_REASON_CPUID:
- inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: CPUID */
- __update_guest_eip(inst_len);
+ update_guest_eip();
vmx_do_cpuid(regs);
break;
case EXIT_REASON_HLT:
- inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: HLT */
- __update_guest_eip(inst_len);
+ update_guest_eip();
hvm_hlt(regs->eflags);
break;
case EXIT_REASON_INVLPG:
- inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: INVLPG */
- __update_guest_eip(inst_len);
+ update_guest_eip();
exit_qualification = __vmread(EXIT_QUALIFICATION);
vmx_invlpg_intercept(exit_qualification);
break;
@@ -2535,19 +2538,17 @@
regs->ecx = hvm_msr_tsc_aux(v);
/* fall through */
case EXIT_REASON_RDTSC:
- inst_len = __get_instruction_length();
- __update_guest_eip(inst_len);
+ update_guest_eip();
hvm_rdtsc_intercept(regs);
break;
case EXIT_REASON_VMCALL:
{
int rc;
HVMTRACE_1D(VMMCALL, regs->eax);
- inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: VMCALL */
rc = hvm_do_hypercall(regs);
if ( rc != HVM_HCALL_preempted )
{
- __update_guest_eip(inst_len);
+ update_guest_eip();
if ( rc == HVM_HCALL_invalidate )
send_invalidate_req();
}
@@ -2556,9 +2557,8 @@
case EXIT_REASON_CR_ACCESS:
{
exit_qualification = __vmread(EXIT_QUALIFICATION);
- inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: MOV Cn, LMSW, CLTS */
if ( vmx_cr_access(exit_qualification, regs) )
- __update_guest_eip(inst_len);
+ update_guest_eip();
break;
}
case EXIT_REASON_DR_ACCESS:
@@ -2568,22 +2568,20 @@
case EXIT_REASON_MSR_READ:
{
uint64_t msr_content;
- inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: RDMSR */
if ( hvm_msr_read_intercept(regs->ecx, &msr_content) ==
X86EMUL_OKAY )
{
regs->eax = (uint32_t)msr_content;
regs->edx = (uint32_t)(msr_content >> 32);
- __update_guest_eip(inst_len);
+ update_guest_eip();
}
break;
}
case EXIT_REASON_MSR_WRITE:
{
uint64_t msr_content;
- inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: WRMSR */
msr_content = ((uint64_t)regs->edx << 32) |
(uint32_t)regs->eax;
if ( hvm_msr_write_intercept(regs->ecx, msr_content) == X86EMUL_OKAY
)
- __update_guest_eip(inst_len);
+ update_guest_eip();
break;
}
@@ -2652,8 +2650,7 @@
case EXIT_REASON_INVD:
case EXIT_REASON_WBINVD:
{
- inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: INVD, WBINVD */
- __update_guest_eip(inst_len);
+ update_guest_eip();
vmx_wbinvd_intercept();
break;
}
@@ -2686,8 +2683,7 @@
u64 new_bv = (((u64)regs->edx) << 32) | regs->eax;
if ( vmx_handle_xsetbv(new_bv) == 0 )
{
- inst_len = __get_instruction_length();
- __update_guest_eip(inst_len);
+ update_guest_eip();
}
break;
}
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Jan Beulich
2010-Sep-15 15:25 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] A simple clean up of __get_instruction_length & __update_guest_eip
>>> On 15.09.10 at 16:34, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com> wrote: > Replace so many sparsed __get_instruction_length & __update_guest_eip with > one function call. > > Signed-off-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com> > > diff -r 221cf46cbf2c xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c Wed Sep 15 17:31:53 2010 +0800 > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c Wed Sep 15 17:46:24 2010 +0800 > @@ -1494,6 +1494,14 @@ > vmx_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_debug, HVM_DELIVER_NO_ERROR_CODE); > } > > +static void update_guest_eip(void) > +{ > + unsigned long inst_len; > + > + inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); > + __update_guest_eip(inst_len); > +} > + > static void vmx_fpu_dirty_intercept(void) > { > struct vcpu *curr = current; > @@ -2244,8 +2252,7 @@ > if ( (((exit_qualification >> 12) & 0xf) == 1) && > ((exit_qualification & 0xfff) == APIC_EOI) ) > { > - int inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: APIC data write > */ > - __update_guest_eip(inst_len); > + update_guest_eip();Is it really a good idea to remove all these "Safe: ..." comments? Without them, I think it''ll be much easier to not remember that this cannot be done everywhere and hence to add an inappropriate call to this function. Jan> vlapic_EOI_set(vcpu_vlapic(current)); > return 1; > } > @@ -2424,8 +2431,7 @@ > case TRAP_int3: > if ( !v->domain->debugger_attached ) > goto exit_and_crash; > - inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: INT3 */ > - __update_guest_eip(inst_len); > + update_guest_eip(); > current->arch.gdbsx_vcpu_event = TRAP_int3; > domain_pause_for_debugger(); > break; > @@ -2516,18 +2522,15 @@ > break; > } > case EXIT_REASON_CPUID: > - inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: CPUID */ > - __update_guest_eip(inst_len); > + update_guest_eip(); > vmx_do_cpuid(regs); > break; > case EXIT_REASON_HLT: > - inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: HLT */ > - __update_guest_eip(inst_len); > + update_guest_eip(); > hvm_hlt(regs->eflags); > break; > case EXIT_REASON_INVLPG: > - inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: INVLPG */ > - __update_guest_eip(inst_len); > + update_guest_eip(); > exit_qualification = __vmread(EXIT_QUALIFICATION); > vmx_invlpg_intercept(exit_qualification); > break; > @@ -2535,19 +2538,17 @@ > regs->ecx = hvm_msr_tsc_aux(v); > /* fall through */ > case EXIT_REASON_RDTSC: > - inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); > - __update_guest_eip(inst_len); > + update_guest_eip(); > hvm_rdtsc_intercept(regs); > break; > case EXIT_REASON_VMCALL: > { > int rc; > HVMTRACE_1D(VMMCALL, regs->eax); > - inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: VMCALL */ > rc = hvm_do_hypercall(regs); > if ( rc != HVM_HCALL_preempted ) > { > - __update_guest_eip(inst_len); > + update_guest_eip(); > if ( rc == HVM_HCALL_invalidate ) > send_invalidate_req(); > } > @@ -2556,9 +2557,8 @@ > case EXIT_REASON_CR_ACCESS: > { > exit_qualification = __vmread(EXIT_QUALIFICATION); > - inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: MOV Cn, LMSW, CLTS > */ > if ( vmx_cr_access(exit_qualification, regs) ) > - __update_guest_eip(inst_len); > + update_guest_eip(); > break; > } > case EXIT_REASON_DR_ACCESS: > @@ -2568,22 +2568,20 @@ > case EXIT_REASON_MSR_READ: > { > uint64_t msr_content; > - inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: RDMSR */ > if ( hvm_msr_read_intercept(regs->ecx, &msr_content) == X86EMUL_OKAY ) > { > regs->eax = (uint32_t)msr_content; > regs->edx = (uint32_t)(msr_content >> 32); > - __update_guest_eip(inst_len); > + update_guest_eip(); > } > break; > } > case EXIT_REASON_MSR_WRITE: > { > uint64_t msr_content; > - inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: WRMSR */ > msr_content = ((uint64_t)regs->edx << 32) | (uint32_t)regs->eax; > if ( hvm_msr_write_intercept(regs->ecx, msr_content) == X86EMUL_OKAY > ) > - __update_guest_eip(inst_len); > + update_guest_eip(); > break; > } > > @@ -2652,8 +2650,7 @@ > case EXIT_REASON_INVD: > case EXIT_REASON_WBINVD: > { > - inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); /* Safe: INVD, WBINVD */ > - __update_guest_eip(inst_len); > + update_guest_eip(); > vmx_wbinvd_intercept(); > break; > } > @@ -2686,8 +2683,7 @@ > u64 new_bv = (((u64)regs->edx) << 32) | regs->eax; > if ( vmx_handle_xsetbv(new_bv) == 0 ) > { > - inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); > - __update_guest_eip(inst_len); > + update_guest_eip(); > } > break; > }_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser
2010-Sep-15 15:38 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] A simple clean up of __get_instruction_length & __update_guest_eip
On 15/09/2010 16:25, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:> Is it really a good idea to remove all these "Safe: ..." comments? > Without them, I think it''ll be much easier to not remember that > this cannot be done everywhere and hence to add an inappropriate > call to this function.I meant to check they were kept, and then forgot and applied it anyway. I''ll add them back in. --Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel