thr3ads.net - Xen devel - [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21503 & Xen0: #e4612f... [Jun 2010]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Xu, Jiajun

2010-Jun-07 15:07 UTC

[Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21503 & Xen0: #e4612f...

Hi all,
	This is our bi-weekly test report for Xen-unstable tree. There are 3 new bugs
found in this two weeks. Save/Restore and Migration cannot work. CPU panic when
destroying guest. On 32b system, CPU will panic when host reboot. Due to the
guest destroy issue, we cannot test latest xen changeset 21508. This report is
based on changeset 21503.
	For bug fixing, the three new bugs reported in last report are all fixed. XenU
and Xen hang issue on 64b platform both fixed.
	We use Pv_ops(xen/master, 2.6.31.13) as Dom0 in our testing.

Status Summary
===================================================================Feature			
Result
------------------------------------------------------
VT-x/VT-x2			PASS
RAS 				Buggy
VT-d					Buggy
SR-IOV				Buggy
TXT					PASS
PowerMgmt			PASS
Other				Buggy

New Bugs (3):
===================================================================1. cpu panic
when rebooting system on PAE host
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1623
2. CPU panic when destroying guest
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1622
3. xm save and xm migrate can''t work
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1621

Fixed Bugs (3)
===================================================================1. xen
hypervisor hang when create guest on 32e platform
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1617
2. CPU panic when running cpu offline
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1616
3. xenu guest can''t boot up
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1618

Old P1 Bugs (1):
====================================================================1. stubdom
based guest hangs at starting when using qcow image.
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1372

Old P2 Bugs (12)
====================================================================1. Failed to
install FC10
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1461
2. Two onboard 82576 NICs assigned to HVM guest cannot work stable if use INTx
interrupt.
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1459
3. stubdom based guest hangs when assigning hdc to it.
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
4. [stubdom]The xm save command hangs while saving <Domain-dm>.
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1377
5. [stubdom] cannot restore stubdom based domain.
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1378
6. Live Migration with md5sum running cause dma_timer_expiry error in guest
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1530
7. Very slow mouse/keyboard and no USB thumbdrive detected w/Core i7 & Pvops
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1541
8. Linux guest boots up very slow with SDL rendering
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1478
9. [RAS] CPUs are not in the correct NUMA node after hot-add memory
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1573
10. [SR-IOV] Qemu report pci_msix_writel error while assigning VF to guest
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1575
11. Can''t create guest with big memory if do not limit Dom0 memory
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1604
12. Add fix for TBOOT/Xen and S3 flow
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1611


Xen Info:
===========================================================================Service
OS : Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.3 (Tikanga)
xen-changeset:   21503:267ecb2ee5bf

pvops git:
commit e4612f9768065b6692dee07af26a7511e936e099
Merge: a3e7c7b... 7ec9d1e...
Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>

ioemu git:
commit ffb0cf2ad55e952dae55e6166c4fcea79be6cd30
Author: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Date:   Thu Apr 15 17:01:15 2010 +0100

Test Environment:
=========================================================================Service
OS : Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga) Hardware :
Westmere-HEDT

   32e           ummary Test Report  
========================================================================================================================================
Total   Pass    Fail    NoResult   Crash
====================================================================vtd_ept_vpid
13      9       4         0        0
control_panel_ept_vpid      13      8       5         0        0
ras_ept_vpid                1       0       1         0        0
gtest_ept_vpid              21      21      0         0        0
acpi_ept_vpid               5       0       4         0        1
sriov_ept_vpid              3       1       1         0        1
====================================================================vtd_ept_vpid
13      9       4         0        0
 :two_dev_smp_nomsi_64_g3   1       1       0         0        0
 :two_dev_scp_64_g32e       1       1       0         0        0
 :lm_pcie_up_64_g32e        1       0       1         0        0
 :lm_pcie_smp_64_g32e       1       0       1         0        0
 :hp_pci_up_64_g32e         1       1       0         0        0
 :two_dev_up_64_g32e        1       1       0         0        0
 :two_dev_up_nomsi_64_g32   1       1       0         0        0
 :lm_pci_up_nomsi_64_g32e   1       0       1         0        0
 :two_dev_smp_64_g32e       1       1       0         0        0
 :one_pcie_smp_nomsi_64_g   1       1       0         0        0
 :two_dev_scp_nomsi_64_g3   1       1       0         0        0
 :lm_pci_smp_nomsi_64_g32   1       0       1         0        0
 :one_pcie_smp_64_g32e      1       1       0         0        0
control_panel_ept_vpid      13      8       5         0        0
 :XEN_1500M_guest_64_g32e   1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_256M_guest_64_gPAE    1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_256M_xenu_64_gPAE     1       0       1         0        0
 :XEN_LM_Continuity_64_g3   1       0       1         0        0
 :XEN_LM_SMP_64_g32e        1       0       1         0        0
 :XEN_vmx_vcpu_pin_64_g32   1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_linux_win_64_g32e     1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_SR_Continuity_64_g3   1       0       1         0        0
 :XEN_vmx_2vcpu_64_g32e     1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_1500M_guest_64_gPAE   1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_two_winxp_64_g32e     1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_256M_guest_64_g32e    1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_SR_SMP_64_g32e        1       0       1         0        0
ras_ept_vpid                1       0       1         0        0
 :cpu_online_offline_64_g   1       0       1         0        0
gtest_ept_vpid              21      21      0         0        0
 :reboot_xp_64_g32e         1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_solaris10u5_64_g32   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_vista_64_g32e     1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_indiana_64_g32e      1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_acpi_xp_64_g32e   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_smp_win7_ent_64_g3   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_smp_acpi_xp_64_g32   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_acpi_64_g32e      1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_win2008_64_g32e   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_base_kernel_64_g32   1       1       0         0        0
 :kb_nightly_64_g32e        1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_acpi_win2k3_64_   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_nevada_64_g32e       1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_fc9_64_g32e          1       1       0         0        0
 :ltp_nightly_64_g32e       1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_smp_vista_64_g32e    1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_smp_win2008_64_g32   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_smp_win7_ent_debug   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_smp_acpi_win2k3_64   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_rhel5u1_64_g32e      1       1       0         0        0
 :reboot_fc6_64_g32e        1       1       0         0        0
acpi_ept_vpid               5       0       4         0        1
 :hvm_s3_smp_sr_64_g32e     1       0       1         0        0
 :monitor_c_status_64_g32   1       0       1         0        0
 :hvm_s3_smp_64_g32e        1       0       1         0        0
 :Dom0_S3_64_g32e           1       0       0         0        1
 :monitor_p_status_64_g32   1       0       1         0        0
sriov_ept_vpid              3       1       1         0        1
 :serial_vfs_smp_64_g32e    1       0       1         0        0
 :one_vf_smp_win2k8_64_g3   1       0       0         0        1
 :one_vf_smp_64_g32e        1       1       0         0        0
====================================================================Total       
56      39      15        0        2

Service OS : Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga) Hardware :
Stoakley

   32e           Summary Test Report 
====================================================================  	         
Total   Pass    Fail    NoResult   Crash
====================================================================vtd_ept_vpid
13      7       6         0        0
control_panel_ept_vpid      12      7       5         0        0
ras_ept_vpid                1       0       0         0        1
gtest_ept_vpid              23      22      1         0        0
acpi_ept_vpid               3       0       0         0        3
====================================================================vtd_ept_vpid
13      7       6         0        0
 :two_dev_scp_nomsi_PAE_g   1       1       0         0        0
 :lm_pci_up_nomsi_PAE_gPA   1       0       1         0        0
 :one_pcie_smp_PAE_gPAE     1       1       0         0        0
 :two_dev_up_PAE_gPAE       1       1       0         0        0
 :lm_pcie_smp_PAE_gPAE      1       0       1         0        0
 :two_dev_smp_nomsi_PAE_g   1       1       0         0        0
 :two_dev_smp_PAE_gPAE      1       1       0         0        0
 :one_pcie_smp_nomsi_PAE_   1       1       0         0        0
 :hp_pci_up_PAE_gPAE        1       0       1         0        0
 :two_dev_up_nomsi_PAE_gP   1       1       0         0        0
 :two_dev_scp_PAE_gPAE      1       0       1         0        0
 :lm_pci_smp_nomsi_PAE_gP   1       0       1         0        0
 :lm_pcie_up_PAE_gPAE       1       0       1         0        0
control_panel_ept_vpid      12      7       5         0        0
 :XEN_4G_guest_PAE_gPAE     1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_linux_win_PAE_gPAE    1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_SR_SMP_PAE_gPAE       1       0       1         0        0
 :XEN_LM_SMP_PAE_gPAE       1       0       1         0        0
 :XEN_SR_Continuity_PAE_g   1       0       1         0        0
 :XEN_vmx_vcpu_pin_PAE_gP   1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_LM_Continuity_PAE_g   1       0       1         0        0
 :XEN_256M_guest_PAE_gPAE   1       0       1         0        0
 :XEN_1500M_guest_PAE_gPA   1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_256M_xenu_PAE_gPAE    1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_two_winxp_PAE_gPAE    1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_vmx_2vcpu_PAE_gPAE    1       1       0         0        0
ras_ept_vpid                1       0       0         0        1
 :cpu_online_offline_PAE_   1       0       0         0        1
gtest_ept_vpid              23      22      1         0        0
 :ltp_nightly_PAE_gPAE      1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_acpi_PAE_gPAE     1       1       0         0        0
 :reboot_xp_PAE_gPAE        1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_acpi_xp_PAE_gPA   1       0       1         0        0
 :boot_up_vista_PAE_gPAE    1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_fc9_PAE_gPAE         1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_smp_win7_ent_PAE_g   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_acpi_win2k3_PAE   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_smp_acpi_win2k3_PA   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_smp_acpi_xp_PAE_gP   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_smp_win7_ent_debug   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_smp_vista_PAE_gPAE   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_noacpi_win2k3_P   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_nevada_PAE_gPAE      1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_rhel5u1_PAE_gPAE     1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_indiana_PAE_gPAE     1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_solaris10u5_PAE_gP   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_base_kernel_PAE_gP   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_win2008_PAE_gPA   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_noacpi_xp_PAE_g   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_smp_win2008_PAE_gP   1       1       0         0        0
 :reboot_fc6_PAE_gPAE       1       1       0         0        0
 :kb_nightly_PAE_gPAE       1       1       0         0        0
acpi_ept_vpid               3       0       0         0        3
 :Dom0_S3_PAE_gPAE          1       0       0         0        1
 :hvm_s3_smp_64_gPAE        1       0       0         0        1
 :hvm_s3_smp_sr_64_gPAE     1       0       0         0        1
====================================================================Total       
52      36      12        0        4

Best Regards,
Jiajun

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Keir Fraser

2010-Jun-07 15:26 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21503 & Xen0: #e4612f...

On 07/06/2010 16:07, "Xu, Jiajun" <jiajun.xu@intel.com> wrote:
> 1. cpu panic when rebooting system on PAE host
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1623
I don''t think this can really be a new bug. I will look into a fix for
it
however.
> 2. CPU panic when destroying guest
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1622
This is fixed already (c/s 21511).
> 3. xm save and xm migrate can''t work
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1621
Given this bug is introduced between changesets 21468 and 21492, it can only
really be introduced by Ian Jackson''s logging patches. I''ve
cc''ed Ian. He
should be able to help get this regression fixed.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Keir Fraser

2010-Jun-07 15:45 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21503 & Xen0: #e4612f...

On 07/06/2010 16:26, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
wrote:
>> 1. cpu panic when rebooting system on PAE host
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1623
> 
> I don''t think this can really be a new bug. I will look into a fix
for it
> however.
Fixed by xen-unstable:21550.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Ian Jackson

2010-Jun-07 17:12 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21503 & Xen0: #e4612f...

Keir Fraser writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen:
#21503 & Xen0: #e4612f..."):> On 07/06/2010 16:07, "Xu, Jiajun" <jiajun.xu@intel.com>
wrote:
> > 3. xm save and xm migrate can''t work
> > http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1621
> 
> Given this bug is introduced between changesets 21468 and 21492, it can
only
> really be introduced by Ian Jackson''s logging patches.
I''ve cc''ed Ian. He
> should be able to help get this regression fixed.
Based on the error message I agree that my patches are a likely
culprit.  I''m not sure why this is happening to Jiajun but not to me
(I did do some simple tests with xm before sending my patch and it
worked at least as well afterwards as before.)

Jiajun: are you using the not-quite-XAPI protocol or traditional
XMLRPC ?  (Do you have "xen-api-server" set in xend-config.sxp?)

What does xend.log say ?  There may well be a stack trace.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Xu, Jiajun

2010-Jun-09 01:31 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21503 & Xen0: #e4612f...

> On 07/06/2010 16:07, "Xu, Jiajun" <jiajun.xu@intel.com>
wrote:
> 
>> 1. cpu panic when rebooting system on PAE host
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1623
> 
> I don''t think this can really be a new bug. I will look into a fix
for it however.
> 
>> 2. CPU panic when destroying guest
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1622
> 
> This is fixed already (c/s 21511).
Thanks, we verified it fixed in c/s 21511.
> 
>> 3. xm save and xm migrate can''t work
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1621
> 
> Given this bug is introduced between changesets 21468 and 21492, it
> can only really be introduced by Ian Jackson''s logging patches.
I''ve
> cc''ed Ian. He should be able to help get this regression fixed.
> 
>  -- Keir
Best Regards,
Jiajun


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Xu, Jiajun

2010-Jun-09 01:34 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21503 & Xen0: #e4612f...

> Keir Fraser writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen:
> #21503 &
> Xen0: #e4612f..."):
>> On 07/06/2010 16:07, "Xu, Jiajun" <jiajun.xu@intel.com>
wrote:
>>> 3. xm save and xm migrate can''t work
>>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1621
>> 
>> Given this bug is introduced between changesets 21468 and 21492, it
>> can only really be introduced by Ian Jackson''s logging
patches. I''ve
>> cc''ed Ian. He should be able to help get this regression
fixed.
> 
> Based on the error message I agree that my patches are a likely
> culprit.  I''m not sure why this is happening to Jiajun but not to
me
> (I did do some simple tests with xm before sending my patch and it
> worked at least as well afterwards as before.)
> 
> Jiajun: are you using the not-quite-XAPI protocol or traditional
> XMLRPC ?  (Do you have "xen-api-server" set in xend-config.sxp?)
> 
> What does xend.log say ?  There may well be a stack trace.
We are not using "xen-api-server" in xend-config.sxp.

The xend log says:
------------
[2010-06-01 10:21:34 5009] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1806) Storing domain details:
{''console/port'': ''6'',
''cpu/3/availability'': ''online'',
''description'': '''',
''console/limit'': ''1048576'',
''store/port'': ''5'',
''cpu/2/availability'': ''online'',
''vm'':
''/vm/cf94ada4-58bc-c508-f1e4-e4968f373125'',
''domid'': ''3'',
''image/suspend-cancel'': ''1'',
''cpu/0/availability'': ''online'',
''memory/target'':
''262144'',
''control/platform-feature-multiprocessor-suspend'':
''1'',
''store/ring-ref'': ''1044476'',
''cpu/1/availability'': ''online'',
''console/type'':
''ioemu'', ''name'':
''migrating-vCPL_LM_40_1275357679''}
[2010-06-01 10:21:34 5009] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1806) Storing domain details:
{''console/port'': ''6'',
''cpu/3/availability'': ''online'',
''description'': '''',
''console/limit'': ''1048576'',
''store/port'': ''5'',
''cpu/2/availability'': ''online'',
''vm'':
''/vm/cf94ada4-58bc-c508-f1e4-e4968f373125'',
''domid'': ''3'',
''image/suspend-cancel'': ''1'',
''cpu/0/availability'': ''online'',
''memory/target'':
''262144'',
''control/platform-feature-multiprocessor-suspend'':
''1'',
''store/ring-ref'': ''1044476'',
''cpu/1/availability'': ''online'',
''console/type'':
''ioemu'', ''name'':
''vCPL_LM_40_1275357679''}
[2010-06-01 10:24:18 5009] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:124) [xc_save]:
/usr/lib64/xen/bin/xc_save 57 3 0 0 4
[2010-06-01 10:24:18 5009] ERROR (XendCheckpoint:178) Save failed on domain
vCPL_LM_40_1275357679 (3) - resuming.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File
"/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/xen/xend/XendCheckpoint.py", line
146, in save
    forkHelper(cmd, fd, saveInputHandler, False)
  File
"/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/xen/xend/XendCheckpoint.py", line
378, in forkHelper
    child = xPopen3(cmd, True, -1, [fd, xc.handle()])
AttributeError: handle
[2010-06-01 10:24:18 5009] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:3147)
XendDomainInfo.resumeDomain(3)
[2010-06-01 10:24:18 5009] ERROR (xmlrpclib2:178) Internal error handling
xend.domain.save Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/xen/util/xmlrpclib2.py",
line 131, in _marshaled_dispatch
    response = self._dispatch(method, params)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/SimpleXMLRPCServer.py", line 406, in
_dispatch
    return func(*params)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/xen/xend/XendDomain.py",
line 1519, in domain_save
    raise e
AttributeError: handle
-------------------------------

Best Regards,
Jiajun



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Keir Fraser

2010-Jun-09 06:57 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21503 & Xen0: #e4612f...

On 09/06/2010 02:34, "Xu, Jiajun" <jiajun.xu@intel.com> wrote:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File
"/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/xen/xend/XendCheckpoint.py", line
> 146, in save
>     forkHelper(cmd, fd, saveInputHandler, False)
>   File
"/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/xen/xend/XendCheckpoint.py", line
> 378, in forkHelper
>     child = xPopen3(cmd, True, -1, [fd, xc.handle()])
> AttributeError: handle
This should be fixed by xen-unstable:21570

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Ian Jackson

2010-Jun-09 09:49 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21503 & Xen0: #e4612f...

Keir Fraser writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen:
#21503 & Xen0: #e4612f..."):> This should be fixed by xen-unstable:21570
Thanks.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Xen devel - Jun 2010 - Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21503 & Xen0: #e4612f...

[Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21503 & Xen0: #e4612f...

Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21503 & Xen0: #e4612f...

Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21503 & Xen0: #e4612f...

Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21503 & Xen0: #e4612f...

RE: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21503 & Xen0: #e4612f...

RE: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21503 & Xen0: #e4612f...

Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21503 & Xen0: #e4612f...

Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21503 & Xen0: #e4612f...