Does the linux-2.6.18-xen.hg go with xen-3.3-testing.hg or xen-unstable.hg? Thanks James _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Both, since we don''t do synced stable releases of the Linux port. -- Keir On 04/12/2008 10:51, "James Harper" <james.harper@bendigoit.com.au> wrote:> Does the linux-2.6.18-xen.hg go with xen-3.3-testing.hg or > xen-unstable.hg? > > Thanks > > James > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> > Does the linux-2.6.18-xen.hg go with xen-3.3-testing.hg or > > xen-unstable.hg? > > > > Both, since we don''t do synced stable releases of the Linux port.Is the current state of linux-2.6.18-xen.hg considered stable enough for production use? I just compiled the released linux-2.6.18-xen-3.3.0.tar.gz so I''m completely free of any Debian distributed kernel, hypervisor, and tools, but the previously discussed zombie pages issue still exists. I''m just about to build linux-2.6.18-xen.hg and see what happens there... Thanks James _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 04/12/2008 11:01, "James Harper" <james.harper@bendigoit.com.au> wrote:>>> Does the linux-2.6.18-xen.hg go with xen-3.3-testing.hg or >>> xen-unstable.hg? >>> >> >> Both, since we don''t do synced stable releases of the Linux port. > > Is the current state of linux-2.6.18-xen.hg considered stable enough for > production use?Yes, the rate of code churn in that repository is fairly low. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel