I was trying to patch Xen 3.2 from the mercurial repository with the MSI patches by Yunhong Jiang given at the bottom of this page : http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-11/msg00157.html The tree seems to have significantly changed, especially the hvm_irq_dpci_mapping structure in irq.h header file. Are there any updated patches, or can I get a version of Xen from somewhere that these patches will successfully patch ? -Anish Bhatt College of Computing Georgia Institute of Technology _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
We will be aiming for MSI support in 3.3, quite likely based on the Intel patches, although that will depend on more detailed review of them. -- Keir On 20/2/08 23:49, "anish@cc.gatech.edu" <anish@cc.gatech.edu> wrote:> I was trying to patch Xen 3.2 from the mercurial repository with the MSI > patches by Yunhong Jiang given at the bottom of this page : > > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-11/msg00157.html > > The tree seems to have significantly changed, especially the > hvm_irq_dpci_mapping structure in irq.h header file. Are there any updated > patches, or can I get a version of Xen from somewhere that these patches > will successfully patch ? > > -Anish Bhatt > > College of Computing > Georgia Institute of Technology > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 18:49 -0500, anish@cc.gatech.edu wrote:> I was trying to patch Xen 3.2 from the mercurial repository with the MSI > patches by Yunhong Jiang given at the bottom of this page : > > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-11/msg00157.html > > The tree seems to have significantly changed, especially the > hvm_irq_dpci_mapping structure in irq.h header file. Are there any updated > patches,Not as far as I know, and I''d be interested in reviewing patches that apply to xen-unstable too. I contacted the patch author a while ago to see if they had an up to date copy but have heard nothing back. Kieran _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> I was trying to patch Xen 3.2 from the mercurial repository >with the MSI >> patches by Yunhong Jiang given at the bottom of this page : >> >> >http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-11/msg0 >0157.html >> >> The tree seems to have significantly changed, especially the >> hvm_irq_dpci_mapping structure in irq.h header file. Are >there any updated >> patches, > >Not as far as I know, and I''d be interested in reviewing patches that >apply to xen-unstable too. I contacted the patch author a while ago to >see if they had an up to date copy but have heard nothing back. >Duo to Chinese new year holidays... _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Hi, Although I am not the author, I will be working on those patches about one week later from now. I will post the status once I finished. Best Regards Haitao Shan Kieran Mansley wrote:> On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 18:49 -0500, anish@cc.gatech.edu wrote: >> I was trying to patch Xen 3.2 from the mercurial repository with the >> MSI patches by Yunhong Jiang given at the bottom of this page : >> >>http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-11/msg00157.html>> >> The tree seems to have significantly changed, especially the >> hvm_irq_dpci_mapping structure in irq.h header file. Are there any >> updated patches, > > Not as far as I know, and I''d be interested in reviewing patches that > apply to xen-unstable too. I contacted the patch author a while ago > to see if they had an up to date copy but have heard nothing back. > > Kieran > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Last time I saw them I was not blown away by the approach taken. Indeed it looked over-complicated and a bit confused. But I may be convinceable otherwise. In any case I will have more time coming up to 3.3 to get MSI support beaten into a shape that I see as reasonable. Getting the existing patches back up to unstable tip would be a good start. -- Keir On 21/2/08 09:19, "Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@intel.com> wrote:> Hi, > > Although I am not the author, I will be working on those patches about > one week later from now. I will post the status once I finished. > > Best Regards > Haitao Shan > > Kieran Mansley wrote: >> On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 18:49 -0500, anish@cc.gatech.edu wrote: >>> I was trying to patch Xen 3.2 from the mercurial repository with the >>> MSI patches by Yunhong Jiang given at the bottom of this page : >>> >>> > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-11/msg00157.html >>> >>> The tree seems to have significantly changed, especially the >>> hvm_irq_dpci_mapping structure in irq.h header file. Are there any >>> updated patches, >> >> Not as far as I know, and I''d be interested in reviewing patches that >> apply to xen-unstable too. I contacted the patch author a while ago >> to see if they had an up to date copy but have heard nothing back. >> >> Kieran >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-devel mailing list >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel