The third release candidate for Xen 3.0.5 is now available at http://xenbits.xensource.com/staging/xen-3.0.5-testing.hg. Quite a few issues are fixed: 32-bit PV-on-HVM on 64-bit hypervisor, virtual framebuffer setup, HVM ioemu and rombios issues, to name a few. I would like the next release candidate to be a *realistic* candidate for release -- hence it is absolutely bug fixes only from here on to reduce churn, and we need as much testing as possible to make -rc4 a good one. We''re getting close! Thanks, Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:54:11AM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:> The third release candidate for Xen 3.0.5 is now available at > http://xenbits.xensource.com/staging/xen-3.0.5-testing.hg. Quite a few > issues are fixed: 32-bit PV-on-HVM on 64-bit hypervisor, virtual framebuffer > setup, HVM ioemu and rombios issues, to name a few. I would like the next > release candidate to be a *realistic* candidate for release -- hence it is > absolutely bug fixes only from here on to reduce churn, and we need as much > testing as possible to make -rc4 a good one. We''re getting close!No comment on the insecurity of the xen API? Are we all missing something? john _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> The third release candidate for Xen 3.0.5 is now available at >> http://xenbits.xensource.com/staging/xen-3.0.5-testing.hg. Quite a few >> issues are fixed: 32-bit PV-on-HVM on 64-bit hypervisor, virtual >> framebuffer >> setup, HVM ioemu and rombios issues, to name a few. I would like the next >> release candidate to be a *realistic* candidate for release -- hence it >> is >> absolutely bug fixes only from here on to reduce churn, and we need as >> much >> testing as possible to make -rc4 a good one. We''re getting close! > > No comment on the insecurity of the xen API? Are we all missing > something?Perhaps you could create an appropriate /etc/pam.d/xend file? cheers, S. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:43:03PM +0100, Steven Hand wrote:> >No comment on the insecurity of the xen API? Are we all missing > >something? > > Perhaps you could create an appropriate /etc/pam.d/xend file?Well, I''d be happy to help if I could but AFAIK we''ve not even had the discussion on what exactly we want to do. Unless you''re referring to disabling logins in the meantime: that''d be fine but someone would still need to work out the certificates thing. regards john _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel