Xen devel - Oct 2006 - [PATCH] Reporting wrong status for non-existant files

Hi,

The block scripts under tools/examples is not reporting the proper
information in the event of a non-exitent file being passed on, like in
"file:/nonexistant,hda,w".

Thanks,

-- 
Glauber de Oliveira Costa
Red Hat Inc.
"Free as in Freedom"


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 04:45:16PM -0300, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The block scripts under tools/examples is not reporting the proper
> information in the event of a non-exitent file being passed on, like in
> "file:/nonexistant,hda,w".
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> Glauber de Oliveira Costa
> Red Hat Inc.
> "Free as in Freedom"
> # HG changeset patch
> # User root@et-virt07.lab.boston.redhat.com
> # Date 1161631865 14400
> # Node ID 6b28d144c5814b5206592e93bcea4b7d0a752e8a
> # Parent  29b02d929b7e4df6016c16ebba71d6d73462882e
> The block script is reporting the file as non-writable, even if it does
> not exists
> 
I''d love to take this patch, but I can''t without a
Signed-off-by: line from
you.  This is true of all the patches you''ve recently sent.  Could you
send
this one again, but with a Signed-off-by line in place, please?

Thanks,

Ewan.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

>
> I''d love to take this patch, but I can''t without a
Signed-off-by: line from
> you.  This is true of all the patches you''ve recently sent.  Could
you send
> this one again, but with a Signed-off-by line in place, please?
Very sorry! ;-)

Should I send them all again with it?


-- 
Glauber de Oliveira Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"

Add your comments to GPLv3 at:
http://gplv3.fsf.org/comments/gplv3-draft-2.html

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel