Howdy, Are we still maintaining a QEMU patch queue anywhere or are patches just going right into unstable? I took a look at Christian''s pq tree on xenbits but it appears to have not been updated in a while. I''m currently looking at the V2E work and there are quite a lot of QEMU changes (a lot of which probably get us closer back to mainline). How do people feel about getting rid of the full QEMU tree in unstable and just having a patch queue? I know there was talk about just using a patch queue for linux for 3.0.4. I''d be willing to submit a patch to add the appropriate makefile magic so that make grabbed a copy of QEMU from somewhere and applied the patches. Regards, Anthony Liguori _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> Are we still maintaining a QEMU patch queue anywhere or are patchesjust> going right into unstable?There already is a patch queue for QEMU within the unstable tree: tools/ioemu/patches/ The full tree is kept as a convenience, but the patch queue is the definitive version. Ian _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Ian Pratt wrote:>> Are we still maintaining a QEMU patch queue anywhere or are patches >> > just > >> going right into unstable? >> > > There already is a patch queue for QEMU within the unstable tree: > tools/ioemu/patches/ > > The full tree is kept as a convenience, but the patch queue is the > definitive version. >There are changesets (such as the recent VNC password) that don''t appear to have corresponding patches in tools/ioemu/patches. Is the idea to apply the patches to the tree and have the patches in hg? Should people be submitting patches against tools/ioemu/patches? Regards, Anthony Liguori> Ian >_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel