Xin, Xiaohui
2006-Sep-01 01:23 UTC
RE: [Xen-devel][PATCH]Fix a shadow error with L*_DISALLOW_MASK for HVM64bit guest
>From my experience booting 64bit Windows, it''s the x64 Windows XP who use these bits in their page table entries.Thanks Xiaohui -----Original Message----- From: Ian Pratt [mailto:m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk] Sent: 2006年8月31日 18:03 To: Xin, Xiaohui; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Cc: ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk Subject: RE: [Xen-devel][PATCH]Fix a shadow error with L*_DISALLOW_MASK for HVM64bit guest> -----Original Message----- > From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-devel- > bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Xin, Xiaohui > Sent: 31 August 2006 09:03 > To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > Subject: [Xen-devel][PATCH]Fix a shadow error with L*_DISALLOW_MASKfor> HVM64bit guest > > This patch fixes a shadow error. For 64bit guest, the [62:52] bits ofPML4> 4 levels page table entries is software available. > > But the L*_DISALLOW_MASK forbids to generate this kind of shadow pagetable> entries.Out of interest, do you know any OSes that use these bits? For PV 64b guests we want Xen to use a s/w bit, and picking one that''s currently unused by any OS would be good. Thanks, Ian _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel