Xen devel - Aug 2006 - [SVM][PATCH] remove redundant do_softirq

> from Keir:
> Another thing: the code you have under case VMEXIT_INTR, which raises 
> schedule softirq, seems pointless. All interrupt work will happen in 
> proper interrupt context triggered on STGI. Should the code under 
> VMEXIT_INTR simply be removed?
Remove redundant do_softirq in the VMEXIT_INTR handler.

Applies cleanly to 11390.
Please apply to xen-unstable.hg.

Signed-off-by: Tom Woller <thomas.woller@amd.com>



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Ok, patch now attached.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com 
> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of 
> Woller, Thomas
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 5:16 PM
> To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> Subject: [Xen-devel] [SVM][PATCH] remove redundant do_softirq
> 
> > from Keir:
> > Another thing: the code you have under case VMEXIT_INTR, 
> which raises 
> > schedule softirq, seems pointless. All interrupt work will 
> happen in 
> > proper interrupt context triggered on STGI. Should the code under 
> > VMEXIT_INTR simply be removed?
> 
> Remove redundant do_softirq in the VMEXIT_INTR handler.
> 
> Applies cleanly to 11390.
> Please apply to xen-unstable.hg.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Woller <thomas.woller@amd.com>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel