-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Here are a few cleanups for the Users'' Manual, including adding a chapter on securing Xen from Anthony Liguori. This is also for testing that I have done things correctly in using the separate doc tree. Please pull from http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/xen-unstable-docs.hg diffstat b/docs/src/user/securing_xen.tex | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++ docs/src/user.tex | 114 ++++++++++++++------------- docs/src/user/installation.tex | 164 ++++++++++++++++----------------------- docs/src/user/introduction.tex | 79 +++++++++--------- docs/src/user/start_addl_dom.tex | 21 ++-- 5 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 199 deletions(-) Regards, Robb - -- Robb Romans (512) 838-0419 Linux Commando T/L 678-0419 ARS NA5TT .-- - ..-. ..--.. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQFDc3wldoW/RCLrCx0RAqEgAJ9ekuPE5/QN+dbPz/C7EGTUYwPGWwCeOB4y LAFEg+knMFHOs+7tQb0NnPU=zAV8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Mark Williamson
2005-Nov-10 17:15 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Please pull xen-unstable-docs
+1 from me. Cheers, Mark On Thursday 10 November 2005 16:58, Robb Romans wrote:> Hi, > > Here are a few cleanups for the Users'' Manual, including adding a > chapter on securing Xen from Anthony Liguori. This is also for testing > that I have done things correctly in using the separate doc tree. > > Please pull from http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/xen-unstable-docs.hg > > diffstat > b/docs/src/user/securing_xen.tex | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++ > docs/src/user.tex | 114 ++++++++++++++------------- > docs/src/user/installation.tex | 164 > ++++++++++++++++----------------------- docs/src/user/introduction.tex | > 79 +++++++++--------- > docs/src/user/start_addl_dom.tex | 21 ++-- > 5 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 199 deletions(-) > > > Regards, > Robb_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On Thursday 10 November 2005 11:58, Robb Romans wrote:> Here are a few cleanups for the Users'' Manual, including adding a > chapter on securing Xen from Anthony Liguori.Who is this guy Anthony Liguori and why is he so dangerous? :-) -- Tired of having to defend against Malware? You know: trojans, viruses, SPYWARE, ADWARE, KEYLOGGERS, rootkits, worms and popups. Then Switch to OpenBSD with a KDE desktop!!! _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Nivedita Singhvi
2005-Nov-10 17:34 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Please pull xen-unstable-docs
Keir Fraser wrote:> > On 10 Nov 2005, at 16:58, Robb Romans wrote: > >> Here are a few cleanups for the Users'' Manual, including adding a >> chapter on securing Xen from Anthony Liguori. This is also for testing >> that I have done things correctly in using the separate doc tree. >> >> Please pull from http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/xen-unstable-docs.hg > > > Thanks! It would be more convenient to send small numbers of patches to > the list, rather than pulling them from an external tree. I end up > having to clone the tree, re-merge and do a diff to check what has > actually been changed (since hg doesn''t have good visualisation tools). > It''s worth it for trees that see plenty of activity like > xen-unstable-ia64 -- it doesn''t currently seem worthwhile for > docuementation unless activity is going to ramp up significantly.Hi Keir, We had talked a bit with Ian about this much earlier, and he had preferred a hg tree. We can always just push patches out, too..We''re going to start ramping up, and hope to put out a steady stream of stuff over the next week, but it won''t be that kind of volume. Let us know if you''d prefer the patches, instead. thanks, Nivedita _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 10 Nov 2005, at 16:58, Robb Romans wrote:> Here are a few cleanups for the Users'' Manual, including adding a > chapter on securing Xen from Anthony Liguori. This is also for testing > that I have done things correctly in using the separate doc tree. > > Please pull from http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/xen-unstable-docs.hgThanks! It would be more convenient to send small numbers of patches to the list, rather than pulling them from an external tree. I end up having to clone the tree, re-merge and do a diff to check what has actually been changed (since hg doesn''t have good visualisation tools). It''s worth it for trees that see plenty of activity like xen-unstable-ia64 -- it doesn''t currently seem worthwhile for docuementation unless activity is going to ramp up significantly. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Nivedita Singhvi
2005-Nov-10 17:35 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Please pull xen-unstable-docs
Dave Feustel wrote:> On Thursday 10 November 2005 11:58, Robb Romans wrote: > >>Here are a few cleanups for the Users'' Manual, including adding a >>chapter on securing Xen from Anthony Liguori. > > > Who is this guy Anthony Liguori and why is he so dangerous? :-)how much time do you have?? :) :) thanks, Nivedita _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 10 Nov 2005, at 17:34, Nivedita Singhvi wrote:> We had talked a bit with Ian about this much earlier, and > he had preferred a hg tree. We can always just push patches > out, too..We''re going to start ramping up, and hope to put > out a steady stream of stuff over the next week, but it won''t > be that kind of volume. > > Let us know if you''d prefer the patches, instead.I would say it is worth using the separate tree if you are producing more than about twenty patches a week. In that case I''m happy to sync an external tree about once a week. Otherwise it is quicker for me to apply emailed patches. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1>>>>> "KF" == Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk> writes:> On 10 Nov 2005, at 16:58, Robb Romans wrote: >> Here are a few cleanups for the Users'' Manual, including adding a >> chapter on securing Xen from Anthony Liguori. This is also for >> testing that I have done things correctly in using the separate >> doc tree. >> >> Please pull from >> http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/xen-unstable-docs.hg KF> Thanks! It would be more convenient to send small numbers of KF> patches to the list, rather than pulling them from an external KF> tree. I end up having to clone the tree, re-merge and do a diff KF> to check what has actually been changed (since hg doesn''t have KF> good visualisation tools). It''s worth it for trees that see KF> plenty of activity like xen-unstable-ia64 -- it doesn''t KF> currently seem worthwhile for docuementation unless activity is KF> going to ramp up significantly. OK. changeset: 7714:79e8991af6b4 user: Robb Romans <FMJ@us.ibm.com> date: Thu Nov 10 10:42:58 2005 -0500 summary: A few doc cleanups. Replace bitkeeper with mercurial. changeset: 7715:f1c07363956b tag: tip user: Robb Romans <FMJ@us.ibm.com> date: Thu Nov 10 10:43:24 2005 -0500 summary: Add "Securing Xen" adapted from Anthony Liguori''s Wiki entry. Regards, Robb - -- Robb Romans (512) 838-0419 Linux Commando T/L 678-0419 ARS NA5TT .-- - ..-. ..--.. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQFDc4ssdoW/RCLrCx0RAvo2AJ9TlcmLNSRFTiy0xxiChmqLCmpxLwCfUhYg lDwQBOLkmmsi7Y6CuC5+7Gg=vwxZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel