Ted Kaczmarek
2005-Sep-22 13:13 UTC
[Xen-devel] changeset:6989 vm sticking around in shutdown state
changeset:6989 FC4, Tyan 2462 SMP Athlon Had a domU get stuck in shutdown state after issuing an init 0 from its console. Issuing an xm destroy had no affect. On a good note, the memory assigned to it was given back and I cloned the config with a new name and the domU was recreated. Also the xend-debug.log is very quite, meaning not a single line written to it. It took a few restarts of that particular domU to make it happen. Questions? Is their any difference between issuing an init 0 at a domU''s console versus doing an xm shutdown from the domO? Looking over the xend.log nothing is jumping out at me, what should I be looking for if indeed their is something that should be their with relation to the vm sticking around? Best Regards, Ted _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Dan Smith
2005-Sep-22 13:57 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] changeset:6989 vm sticking around in shutdown state
TK> I cloned the config with a new name and the domU was recreated. This brings me back to the topic of renaming stuck domains. It seems to me that having the tools prevent you from re-creating a domain just because a shell of the domain is stuck will get annoying. Admins may end up cloning a config file and tweaking the name several times to get the tools to allow recreation of one of their domUs without having to reboot the host. I know that the domains *shouldn''t* get stuck once everything firms up, but can''t we have the tools be more user-friendly if the problem does arise in a production environment? How about adding a "force" flag to "xm create" that would rename any stuck domains so that the creation can proceed? -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms@us.ibm.com _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Ted Kaczmarek
2005-Sep-22 14:10 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] changeset:6989 vm sticking around in shutdown state
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 06:57 -0700, Dan Smith wrote:> TK> I cloned the config with a new name and the domU was recreated. > > This brings me back to the topic of renaming stuck domains. It seems > to me that having the tools prevent you from re-creating a domain just > because a shell of the domain is stuck will get annoying. Admins may > end up cloning a config file and tweaking the name several times to > get the tools to allow recreation of one of their domUs without having > to reboot the host. > > I know that the domains *shouldn''t* get stuck once everything firms > up, but can''t we have the tools be more user-friendly if the problem > does arise in a production environment? > > How about adding a "force" flag to "xm create" that would rename any > stuck domains so that the creation can proceed?Sound like a good starting point, you thinking about appending an instance to the name? I am of the mindset that something like allow creation with the same name, but invalidate the old one or vice versa. This would also keep track of how many times such an issue occured on a particular domU. xm list Name Id Mem(MB) CPU VCPU(s) State Time(s) Domain-0 0 182 - 2 r---- 970.7 debian 3 128 - 2 -b--- 502.4 debian.1 3.1 0 - 2 ---s- 91.1 xm list Name Id Mem(MB) CPU VCPU(s) State Time(s) Domain-0 0 182 - 2 r---- 970.7 debian 3 0 - 2 ---s- 502.4 debian.1 3.1 128 - 2 -b--- 91.1 I am still rather green with this, but from a dumb ___ admin/user perspective this would be very helpful :-) Regards, Ted _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Dan Smith
2005-Sep-22 14:22 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] changeset:6989 vm sticking around in shutdown state
TK> Sound like a good starting point, you thinking about appending an TK> instance to the name? We previously discussed adding something like -zombie-X to the name, where X is the old numeric domid. That would make it evident that the domain was hanging around after death. TK> I am of the mindset that something like allow creation with the TK> same name, but invalidate the old one or vice versa. Yea, so, since Xend looks things up mostly by name, we need to create the new domain with the real name, and mangle the name of the zombie so that it mostly gets ignored. TK> This would also keep track of how many times such an issue occured TK> on a particular domU. Well, it would keep track of stuck instances, true. I don''t think we want to keep track of anything that we don''t have to. That''s what the logs are for :) TK> Name Id Mem(MB) CPU VCPU(s) State Time(s) TK> Domain-0 0 182 - 2 r---- 970.7 TK> debian 3 128 - 2 -b--- 502.4 TK> debian.1 3.1 0 - 2 ---s- 91.1 I think it would/should look like this: Name Id Mem(MB) CPU VCPU(s) State Time(s) Domain-0 0 182 - 2 r---- 970.7 debian-zombie-3 3 0 - 2 ---s- 502.4 debian 4 128 - 2 -b--- 91.1 -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms@us.ibm.com _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Ian Pratt
2005-Sep-23 22:30 UTC
RE: [Xen-devel] changeset:6989 vm sticking around in shutdown state
> TK> Sound like a good starting point, you thinking about appending an> TK> instance to the name? > > We previously discussed adding something like -zombie-X to > the name, where X is the old numeric domid. That would make > it evident that the domain was hanging around after death.-zombie-domid seems like a good approach. I don''t think anyone has posted a patch yet... Ian _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Dan Smith
2005-Sep-26 15:01 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] changeset:6989 vm sticking around in shutdown state
IP> -zombie-domid seems like a good approach. I don''t think anyone has IP> posted a patch yet... I did: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-09/msg00565.html -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms@us.ibm.com _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel