Parth Gupta
2012-Apr-04 08:33 UTC
[Xapian-devel] Doubt regarding Feature selection for 'Learning to Rank' algorithms
Hi Rishabh, I had this feeling before. This is a really nice idea BUT we can not go ahead with the project which is still not tested in the experimental settings. Though it may be a wonderful research exercise, I would still vote to go for the state-of-the-art methods which are completely published with full details and experimental results. Hope you get my point. Regards, Parth. On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Rishabh Mehrotra <erishabh at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi Parth, > Please find below the conversations I had with Hang Li sir and Prof. Liu > regarding my proposed methodology. > Regards, > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Tie-Yan Liu <Tie-Yan.Liu at microsoft.com> > Date: 2012/4/3 > Subject: RE: Doubt regarding Feature selection for 'Learning to Rank' > algorithms > To: "Hang Li (MSR)" <hangli at microsoft.com>, Rishabh Mehrotra < > erishabh at gmail.com> > > > In my opinion, features definitely play an important role in learning to > rank. Combining ListMLE with deep learning sounds interesting. We are eager > to see the performance of your implementation. **** > > ** ** > > Thanks**** > > Tie-Yan**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Hang Li (MSR) > *Sent:* 2012?4?1? 10:33 > *To:* Rishabh Mehrotra > *Cc:* Tie-Yan Liu > *Subject:* RE: Doubt regarding Feature selection for 'Learning to Rank' > algorithms**** > > ** ** > > Rishabh**** > > ** ** > > Thank you for your interest.**** > > ** ** > > I am not quite sure whether it is easy to make improvement by combining > deep learning and ListMLE. But you can try. **** > > ** ** > > To me, ListMLE is a very elegant model and since it is a log linear model, > it appears to have a good match with deep learning.**** > > ** ** > > Maybe you can also get some comment from Tie-Yan.**** > > ** ** > > Hang**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Rishabh Mehrotra [mailto:erishabh at gmail.com] > *Sent:* Saturday, March 31, 2012 1:03 AM > *To:* Hang Li (MSR) > *Subject:* Doubt regarding Feature selection for 'Learning to Rank' > algorithms**** > > ** ** > > Hello sir,**** > > ** ** > > I attended your talk on Learning to Rank at MLSS 2011 at NUS Singapore > last year in June. I was going through various Listwise approaches for > ranking and **** > > the various features used to represent the documents.**** > > ** ** > > Recently Deep architectures have been used to learn feature > representations in an unsupervised manner and have outperformed the > state-of-the-art algorithms for various classification tasks. I am planning > to work for an open-source organization and help them in implementing an > algorithm for their Learing to Rank module. **** > > ** ** > > I have decided to implement the *ListMLE algorithm* which you proposed in > 2008. Instead of applying the conventional IR features I am thinking of > using *Autoencoders* or other deep learning algorithm for feature > extraction. It would really help me if you could comment on this decision: > will it help me improve the performance or is it that features do not play > that major a role in this sub-field of IR.**** > > ** ** > > Any suggestions form your side would really help me a lot. Thank you for > your time.**** > > ** ** > > Best regards,**** > > Rishabh Mehrotra,**** > > BITS Pilani,**** > > India.**** > > > > -- > Rishabh. > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xapian.org/pipermail/xapian-devel/attachments/20120404/2421d293/attachment.html>