> Great news!! So is the swig-version going to be first released with 2.5
> support? The documentation I''m working on parses the 2.4 xml file.
Will
> the original parser create a xml file in the same format for 2.5 ?
Thankfully, the XML hasn''t changed - I''m using the same file
and
removing the stripped methods.
> I think a while back there was some talk of having methods like
> "set_label" be changed to a more Ruby-attribute-like
"label=" syntax.
> Is this still being considered? I''m very much in favor of it, but
I''m
> wondering how the switch will be handled. Would both sets of methods
> be kept, or would the get_xxx and set_xxx methods be dropped? In the
> case of the latter, I''m wondering if it would be good to consider
this
> a basic part of the switchover to wxruby-swig.
Thats still the intention, but it probably won''t be until we get
wxruby-swig to match the wxruby functionality. It has to be done by
hand, which isn''t something I want to mess with at the moment.
Nick
