search for: set_xxx

...uot;set_label" be changed to a more Ruby-attribute-like "label=" syntax. > Is this still being considered? I''m very much in favor of it, but I''m > wondering how the switch will be handled. Would both sets of methods > be kept, or would the get_xxx and set_xxx methods be dropped? In the > case of the latter, I''m wondering if it would be good to consider this > a basic part of the switchover to wxruby-swig. Thats still the intention, but it probably won''t be until we get wxruby-swig to match the wxruby functionality. It has to...

Good news and bad news. First he good news. wxruby-swig now compiles on Linux, Mac, and Windows using wxWidgets 2.5. I just patched a bug with the paint method today, but it''s getting very close to the first release of wxruby. With a little more cleanup, I think we''re getting ready to do a first release of it, which will hopefully replaced wxruby. Of course, the debug spew