Heya all, Anyone have any ideas on this one? http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=13825&group_id=85&atid=411 It''s easy enough to rescue, I''d just like to know what MRI does in this case, so we can duplicate it. Regards, Dan
Hi, 2007/9/21, Daniel Berger <djberg96 at gmail.com>:> Heya all, > > Anyone have any ideas on this one? > > > http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=13825&group_id=85&atid=411 > > It''s easy enough to rescue, I''d just like to know what MRI does in this > case, so we can duplicate it. > > Regards, > > DanAccording to msdn( http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/14h5k7ff(VS.71).aspx), st_ctime Time of creation of file. Valid on NTFS but not on FAT formatted disk drives. Maybe the Linux Samba version is not up-to-date. In my test with Samba 3.0.22, stat64 st_ctime works fine. Regards, Park Heesob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/win32utils-devel/attachments/20070921/6b7fef2a/attachment.html
Heesob Park wrote:> Hi, > > 2007/9/21, Daniel Berger <djberg96 at gmail.com <mailto:djberg96 at gmail.com>>: > > Heya all, > > Anyone have any ideas on this one? > > http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=13825&group_id=85&atid=411 > <http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=13825&group_id=85&atid=411> > > It''s easy enough to rescue, I''d just like to know what MRI does in this > case, so we can duplicate it. > > Regards, > > Dan > > > According to > msdn(http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/14h5k7ff(VS.71).aspx), > > st_ctime > Time of creation of file. Valid on NTFS but not on FAT formatted disk > drives. > > Maybe the Linux Samba version is not up-to-date. > > In my test with Samba 3.0.22, stat64 st_ctime works fine.Hm, how do you think we should handle this, though? Set the times to Time.at(0)? Time.now? nil? I''m guessing that Time.at(0) is what MRI returns. Regards, Dan
2007/9/28, Daniel Berger <djberg96 at gmail.com>:> > Heesob Park wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 2007/9/21, Daniel Berger <djberg96 at gmail.com <mailto:djberg96 at gmail.com > >>: > > > > Heya all, > > > > Anyone have any ideas on this one? > > > > > http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=13825&group_id=85&atid=411 > > < > http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=13825&group_id=85&atid=411 > > > > > > It''s easy enough to rescue, I''d just like to know what MRI does in > this > > case, so we can duplicate it. > > > > Regards, > > > > Dan > > > > > > According to > > msdn(http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/14h5k7ff(VS.71).aspx), > > > > st_ctime > > Time of creation of file. Valid on NTFS but not on FAT formatted disk > > drives. > > > > Maybe the Linux Samba version is not up-to-date. > > > > In my test with Samba 3.0.22, stat64 st_ctime works fine. > > Hm, how do you think we should handle this, though? Set the times to > Time.at(0)? Time.now? nil? > > I''m guessing that Time.at(0) is what MRI returns.I think Time.at(0) is a reasonable workaround. Regards, Park Heesob. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/win32utils-devel/attachments/20070928/8841a800/attachment.html