Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-Jul-03 14:52 UTC
[PATCH] vdpa: reject F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK if backend does not support it
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 04:22:18PM +0200, Eugenio P?rez wrote:> With the current code it is accepted as long as userland send it. > > Although userland should not set a feature flag that has not been > offered to it with VHOST_GET_BACKEND_FEATURES, the current code will not > complain for it. > > Since there is no specific reason for any parent to reject that backend > feature bit when it has been proposed, let's control it at vdpa frontend > level. Future patches may move this control to the parent driver. > > Fixes: 967800d2d52e ("vdpa: accept VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK backend feature") > Signed-off-by: Eugenio P?rez <eperezma at redhat.com>Please do send v3. And again, I don't want to send "after driver ok" hack upstream at all, I merged it in next just to give it some testing. We want RING_ACCESS_AFTER_KICK or some such.> --- > Sent with Fixes: tag pointing to git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst > commit. Please let me know if I should send a v3 of [1] instead. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230609121244-mutt-send-email-mst at kernel.org/T/ > --- > drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c > index e1abf29fed5b..a7e554352351 100644 > --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c > @@ -681,18 +681,21 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_unlocked_ioctl(struct file *filep, > { > struct vhost_vdpa *v = filep->private_data; > struct vhost_dev *d = &v->vdev; > + const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = v->vdpa->config; > void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg; > u64 __user *featurep = argp; > - u64 features; > + u64 features, parent_features = 0; > long r = 0; > > if (cmd == VHOST_SET_BACKEND_FEATURES) { > if (copy_from_user(&features, featurep, sizeof(features))) > return -EFAULT; > + if (ops->get_backend_features) > + parent_features = ops->get_backend_features(v->vdpa); > if (features & ~(VHOST_VDPA_BACKEND_FEATURES | > BIT_ULL(VHOST_BACKEND_F_SUSPEND) | > BIT_ULL(VHOST_BACKEND_F_RESUME) | > - BIT_ULL(VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK))) > + parent_features)) > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > if ((features & BIT_ULL(VHOST_BACKEND_F_SUSPEND)) && > !vhost_vdpa_can_suspend(v)) > -- > 2.39.3
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [PATCH] vdpa: reject F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK if backend does not support it
- [PATCH] vdpa: reject F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK if backend does not support it
- [GIT PULL] virtio: features
- [GIT PULL] virtio: features
- [PATCH] mlx5_vdpa: offer VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK