Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "f_enable_after_driver_ok".
2023 Jul 03
0
[PATCH] vdpa: reject F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK if backend does not support it
...gt;
> Since there is no specific reason for any parent to reject that backend
> feature bit when it has been proposed, let's control it at vdpa frontend
> level. Future patches may move this control to the parent driver.
>
> Fixes: 967800d2d52e ("vdpa: accept VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK backend feature")
> Signed-off-by: Eugenio P?rez <eperezma at redhat.com>
Please do send v3. And again, I don't want to send "after driver ok" hack
upstream at all, I merged it in next just to give it some testing.
We want RING_ACCESS_AFTER_KICK or some such.
> ---...
2023 Jul 04
1
[PATCH] vdpa: reject F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK if backend does not support it
...ason for any parent to reject that backend
> > > feature bit when it has been proposed, let's control it at vdpa frontend
> > > level. Future patches may move this control to the parent driver.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 967800d2d52e ("vdpa: accept VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK backend feature")
> > > Signed-off-by: Eugenio P?rez <eperezma at redhat.com>
> >
> > Please do send v3. And again, I don't want to send "after driver ok" hack
> > upstream at all, I merged it in next just to give it some testing.
> > We wan...
2023 Jul 04
1
[PATCH] vdpa: reject F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK if backend does not support it
...nd
> > > > > feature bit when it has been proposed, let's control it at vdpa frontend
> > > > > level. Future patches may move this control to the parent driver.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 967800d2d52e ("vdpa: accept VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK backend feature")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Eugenio P?rez <eperezma at redhat.com>
> > > >
> > > > Please do send v3. And again, I don't want to send "after driver ok" hack
> > > > upstream at all, I merged it in next just t...