Virtualization - Feb 2015 - [PATCH RFC v5 net-next 1/6] virtio_ring: fix virtqueue_enable_cb() when only 1 buffers were pending

Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes:
> We currently does:
>
> bufs = (avail->idx - last_used_idx) * 3 / 4;
>
> This is ok now since we only try to enable the delayed callbacks when
> the queue is about to be full. This may not work well when there is
> only one pending buffer in the virtqueue (this may be the case after
> tx interrupt was enabled). Since virtqueue_enable_cb() will return
> false which may cause unnecessary triggering of napis. This patch
> correct this by only calculate the four thirds when bufs is not one.
I mildly prefer to avoid the branch, by changing the calculation like
so:

        /* Set bufs >= 1, even if there's only one pending buffer */
        bufs = (bufs + 1) * 3 / 4;

But it's not clear to me how much this happens.  I'm happy with the
patch though, as currently virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed() is the same
as virtqueue_enable_cb() if there's only been one buffer added.

Cheers,
Rusty.
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 00ec6b3..545fed5 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -636,7 +636,10 @@ bool virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(struct virtqueue
*_vq)
>  	 * entry. Always do both to keep code simple. */
>  	vq->vring.avail->flags &= cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev,
~VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT);
>  	/* TODO: tune this threshold */
> -	bufs = (u16)(virtio16_to_cpu(_vq->vdev, vq->vring.avail->idx) -
vq->last_used_idx) * 3 / 4;
> +	bufs = (u16)(virtio16_to_cpu(_vq->vdev, vq->vring.avail->idx) -
> +		                     vq->last_used_idx);
> +	if (bufs != 1)
> +		bufs = bufs * 3 / 4;
>  	vring_used_event(&vq->vring) = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev,
vq->last_used_idx + bufs);
>  	virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
>  	if (unlikely((u16)(virtio16_to_cpu(_vq->vdev,
vq->vring.used->idx) - vq->last_used_idx) > bufs)) {
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Virtualization mailing list
> Virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> 
wrote:
> Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes:
>>  We currently does:
>> 
>>  bufs = (avail->idx - last_used_idx) * 3 / 4;
>> 
>>  This is ok now since we only try to enable the delayed callbacks 
>> when
>>  the queue is about to be full. This may not work well when there is
>>  only one pending buffer in the virtqueue (this may be the case after
>>  tx interrupt was enabled). Since virtqueue_enable_cb() will return
>>  false which may cause unnecessary triggering of napis. This patch
>>  correct this by only calculate the four thirds when bufs is not one.
> 
> I mildly prefer to avoid the branch, by changing the calculation like
> so:
> 
>         /* Set bufs >= 1, even if there's only one pending buffer */
>         bufs = (bufs + 1) * 3 / 4;
Ok.
> 
> But it's not clear to me how much this happens. 
Depends on the traffic type. In some case e.g one session TCP_RR test 
(which has at most 1 pending packet), it may happen very
often.
>  I'm happy with the
> patch though, as currently virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed() is the same
> as virtqueue_enable_cb() if there's only been one buffer added.
Yes. Thanks.
> 
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
> 
>>  Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>
>>  ---
>>   drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 5 ++++-
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>>  diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c 
>> b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
>>  index 00ec6b3..545fed5 100644
>>  --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
>>  +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
>>  @@ -636,7 +636,10 @@ bool virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(struct 
>> virtqueue *_vq)
>>   	 * entry. Always do both to keep code simple. */
>>   	vq->vring.avail->flags &= cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, 
>> ~VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT);
>>   	/* TODO: tune this threshold */
>>  -	bufs = (u16)(virtio16_to_cpu(_vq->vdev,
vq->vring.avail->idx) -
>> vq->last_used_idx) * 3 / 4;
>>  +	bufs = (u16)(virtio16_to_cpu(_vq->vdev,
vq->vring.avail->idx) -
>>  +		                     vq->last_used_idx);
>>  +	if (bufs != 1)
>>  +		bufs = bufs * 3 / 4;
>>   	vring_used_event(&vq->vring) = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, 
>> vq->last_used_idx + bufs);
>>   	virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
>>   	if (unlikely((u16)(virtio16_to_cpu(_vq->vdev, 
>> vq->vring.used->idx) - vq->last_used_idx) > bufs)) {
>>  -- 
>>  1.8.3.1
>> 
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Virtualization mailing list
>>  Virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org
>>  https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:33:52AM +1030, Rusty Russell
wrote:
> Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes:
> > We currently does:
> >
> > bufs = (avail->idx - last_used_idx) * 3 / 4;
> >
> > This is ok now since we only try to enable the delayed callbacks when
> > the queue is about to be full. This may not work well when there is
> > only one pending buffer in the virtqueue (this may be the case after
> > tx interrupt was enabled). Since virtqueue_enable_cb() will return
> > false which may cause unnecessary triggering of napis. This patch
> > correct this by only calculate the four thirds when bufs is not one.
> 
> I mildly prefer to avoid the branch, by changing the calculation like
> so:
> 
>         /* Set bufs >= 1, even if there's only one pending buffer */
>         bufs = (bufs + 1) * 3 / 4;
Or bus * 3/4 + 1
> But it's not clear to me how much this happens.  I'm happy with the
> patch though, as currently virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed() is the same
> as virtqueue_enable_cb() if there's only been one buffer added.
> 
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
But isn't this by design?
The documentation says:

 * This re-enables callbacks but hints to the other side to delay
 * interrupts until most of the available buffers have been processed;

Clearly, this implies that when there's one buffer it must behave
exactly the same.

So I'm not very happy - this changes the meaning of the API without
updating the documentation.

> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 5 ++++-
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > index 00ec6b3..545fed5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > @@ -636,7 +636,10 @@ bool virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(struct virtqueue
*_vq)
> >  	 * entry. Always do both to keep code simple. */
> >  	vq->vring.avail->flags &= cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev,
~VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT);
> >  	/* TODO: tune this threshold */
> > -	bufs = (u16)(virtio16_to_cpu(_vq->vdev,
vq->vring.avail->idx) - vq->last_used_idx) * 3 / 4;
> > +	bufs = (u16)(virtio16_to_cpu(_vq->vdev,
vq->vring.avail->idx) -
> > +		                     vq->last_used_idx);
> > +	if (bufs != 1)
> > +		bufs = bufs * 3 / 4;
> >  	vring_used_event(&vq->vring) = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev,
vq->last_used_idx + bufs);
> >  	virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
> >  	if (unlikely((u16)(virtio16_to_cpu(_vq->vdev,
vq->vring.used->idx) - vq->last_used_idx) > bufs)) {
> > -- 
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Virtualization mailing list
> > Virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com>
writes:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:33:52AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes:
>> > We currently does:
>> >
>> > bufs = (avail->idx - last_used_idx) * 3 / 4;
>> >
>> > This is ok now since we only try to enable the delayed callbacks
when
>> > the queue is about to be full. This may not work well when there
is
>> > only one pending buffer in the virtqueue (this may be the case
after
>> > tx interrupt was enabled). Since virtqueue_enable_cb() will return
>> > false which may cause unnecessary triggering of napis. This patch
>> > correct this by only calculate the four thirds when bufs is not
one.
>> 
>> I mildly prefer to avoid the branch, by changing the calculation like
>> so:
>> 
>>         /* Set bufs >= 1, even if there's only one pending
buffer */
>>         bufs = (bufs + 1) * 3 / 4;
>
> Or bus * 3/4 + 1
>
>> But it's not clear to me how much this happens.  I'm happy with
the
>> patch though, as currently virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed() is the same
>> as virtqueue_enable_cb() if there's only been one buffer added.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Rusty.
>
> But isn't this by design?
> The documentation says:
>
>  * This re-enables callbacks but hints to the other side to delay
>  * interrupts until most of the available buffers have been processed;
>
> Clearly, this implies that when there's one buffer it must behave
> exactly the same.
Yes, my mistake.  We could hit the "never gets notified" case with
this
change, and that's a much bigger problem.

So I don't think we can accept this patch...
Rusty.

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> 
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:33:52AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>  Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes:
>>  > We currently does:
>>  >
>>  > bufs = (avail->idx - last_used_idx) * 3 / 4;
>>  >
>>  > This is ok now since we only try to enable the delayed callbacks 
>> when
>>  > the queue is about to be full. This may not work well when there 
>> is
>>  > only one pending buffer in the virtqueue (this may be the case 
>> after
>>  > tx interrupt was enabled). Since virtqueue_enable_cb() will
return
>>  > false which may cause unnecessary triggering of napis. This patch
>>  > correct this by only calculate the four thirds when bufs is not 
>> one.
>>  
>>  I mildly prefer to avoid the branch, by changing the calculation 
>> like
>>  so:
>>  
>>          /* Set bufs >= 1, even if there's only one pending
buffer */
>>          bufs = (bufs + 1) * 3 / 4;
> 
> Or bus * 3/4 + 1
> 
>>  But it's not clear to me how much this happens.  I'm happy
with the
>>  patch though, as currently virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed() is the same
>>  as virtqueue_enable_cb() if there's only been one buffer added.
>>  
>>  Cheers,
>>  Rusty.
> 
> But isn't this by design?
> The documentation says:
> 
>  * This re-enables callbacks but hints to the other side to delay
>  * interrupts until most of the available buffers have been processed;
> 
> Clearly, this implies that when there's one buffer it must behave
> exactly the same.
> 
> So I'm not very happy - this changes the meaning of the API without
> updating the documentation.
Think hard about this. And looks like your are right. And the patch may 
in fact cause more trouble e.g the only pending buffer were consumed 
before the final check between used idx and last_used_idx.

Will drop this.

Thanks