Virtualization - Apr 2014 - [PATCH v9 05/19] qspinlock: Optimize for smaller NR_CPUS

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 01:52:50PM -0400, Waiman Long
wrote:
> I am confused by your notation.
Nah, I think I was confused :-) Make the 1 _Q_LOCKED_VAL though, as
that's the proper constant to use.

On 04/18/2014 03:05 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 01:52:50PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> I am confused by your notation.
> Nah, I think I was confused :-) Make the 1 _Q_LOCKED_VAL though, as
> that's the proper constant to use.
Everyone gets confused once in a while:-) I have plenty of that myself.

I will change 1 to _Q_LOCKED_VAL as suggested.

-Longman

On 04/18/2014 05:40 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 04/18/2014 03:05 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 01:52:50PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>>> I am confused by your notation.
>> Nah, I think I was confused :-) Make the 1 _Q_LOCKED_VAL though, as
>> that's the proper constant to use.
>
> Everyone gets confused once in a while:-) I have plenty of that myself.
>
> I will change 1 to _Q_LOCKED_VAL as suggested.
>
> -Longman

The attached patch file contains the additional changes that I had made 
to qspinlock.c file so far. Please let me know if you or others have any 
additional feedbacks or changes that will need to go to the next version 
of the patch series.

I am going to take vacation starting from tomorrow and will be back on 
5/5 (Mon). So I will not be able to respond to emails within this period.

BTW, is there any chance that this patch can be merged to 3.16?

-Longman
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: qspinlock_extra_diff.patch
URL:
<http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20140423/aa2741a9/attachment.ksh>