search for: smaller

...the results of our memory utilization tests. The 'Mem max' > numbers aren't particularly revealing though, so take a look at the > graphs. I think the spambayes benchmark was one of the most > interesting. > > ### 2to3 ### > Mem max: 39008.000 -> 38904.000: 1.0027x smaller > Usage over time: http://tinyurl.com/3axczjc > > ### bzr_startup ### > Mem max: 11996.000 -> 11984.000: 1.0010x smaller > Usage over time: http://tinyurl.com/2ucnbhb > > ### call_method ### > Mem max: 11632.000 -> 11544.000: 1.0076x smaller > Usage over time: htt...

...inklabs.net/1905049 Here are the results of our memory utilization tests. The 'Mem max' numbers aren't particularly revealing though, so take a look at the graphs. I think the spambayes benchmark was one of the most interesting. ### 2to3 ### Mem max: 39008.000 -> 38904.000: 1.0027x smaller Usage over time: http://tinyurl.com/3axczjc ### bzr_startup ### Mem max: 11996.000 -> 11984.000: 1.0010x smaller Usage over time: http://tinyurl.com/2ucnbhb ### call_method ### Mem max: 11632.000 -> 11544.000: 1.0076x smaller Usage over time: http://tinyurl.com/22r6y9r ### call_method_slot...

I have one drive that I''m running OpenSolaris on and a 6-drive RAIDZ. Unfortunately I don''t have another drive to mirror the OS drive, so I was wondering what the best way to back up that drive is. Can I mirror it onto a file on the RAIDZ, or will this cause problems before the array is loaded when booting? What about zfs send and recv to the RAIDZ? -- This message posted from

(... to Nabble Ext3:Users - reposted by me after I joined the ext3-users mailing list - sorry for the dup...) A bit of a rambling subject there but I am trying to figure out if it is more efficient at runtime to have few very large file systems (8 TB) vs a larger number of smaller file systems. The file systems will hold many small files. My preference is to have a larger number of smaller file systems for faster recovery and less impact if a problem does occur, but I was wondering if anybody had information from a runtime performance perspective - is there a difference b...

For a root-qdisc, can the bandwidth be smaller than the bandwidth of the device？ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi, all ecdf function (Empirical Cumulative Distribution Function) in "stats" package counts from smaller values to larger values. However, I want to draw it by counting from larger value to smaller values and I couldn't find options for this purpose. How can I draw ecdf or ecdf like graph by counting from larger values to smaller values. Thank you in advance. Hyunchul Kim [[alternative HTML v...

...same activity. How can I do that? data frame: activity max_dt A 2013-03-05 B 2013-03-28 A 2013-03-28 C 2013-03-28 B 2013-03-01 Thank you for your help -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Removing-rows-w-smaller-value-from-data-frame-tp4667816.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

I installed a Solaris 10 development box on a 500G root mirror and later I received some smaller drives. I learned from this list its better to have the root mirror on the smaller small drives and then create another mirror on the original 500G drives so I copied everything that was on the small drives onto the 500G mirror to free up the smaller drives for a new install. After my install comp...

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.14.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.14.tar.gz.sig Looks like it took a bit longer to make this release after RC1 than I thought. I'm now in San Jose area for a few months and still jumping between apartments and trying to adjust to the new timezone. Some of the more important fixes since RC1: - Fixed several race conditions with

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.14.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.14.tar.gz.sig Looks like it took a bit longer to make this release after RC1 than I thought. I'm now in San Jose area for a few months and still jumping between apartments and trying to adjust to the new timezone. Some of the more important fixes since RC1: - Fixed several race conditions with

(Below is my idea on an issue that has troubled me for a fairly long time. I hope it's not viewed as trouble making.) A Call for a Smaller R Core Package This document suggests downsizing the 'core' package of R by taking out some specialized functionalities to form their own packages. I'll use string related functions as examples, because I happened to be troubled by them today. 1. The core is too big R is a function r...

...3 4 9 2 4 6 3 9 1 1 7 0 2 5 6 3 8 and I need it to be split into something like this: X Y 1 2 3 3 4 9 2 4 6 3 X Y 9 1 1 7 0 2 5 6 3 8 I am thinking I need to write a loop because my data set is much larger than this (1000) and I need it all organized into smaller data sets of 5's. Can someone point me in the write direction? Thanks, Andy -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Splitting-a-data-list-into-smaller-data-lists-tp4389142p4389142.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

...the pdf device, I get file sizes (on a Windows machine) of about 10 MB. When I then zip the files, I'm down to about 0.5MB, so the original pdf files were created with a lot of 'air'. I'm wondering why the pdf files are so large and whether there is an alternative to produce them smaller. Any ideas? Have a nice afternoon, Chris.

...time to time lmtp(17147, user1 at example.com): Error: read(attachments-connector(zlib(/var/spool/mail/example.com/user2/mail/storage/m.203))) failed: read(/srv/attachments/user2/4a/e0/4ae062027dd745f56c2cc1c43fa4f349f52986a0-2bcf4e063994235bfb4200006f28d014[base64:19 b/l]) failed: Stream is smaller than expected (0 < 5098) Replication works, but is there a way to recover the logic even with empty files or cleaning indices? Thanks Vladimir

Hi, Just wondering is there a way to make the width of bar charts that you create using R smaller? Also, a bar chart I created has a total number of 23 entries (with 2 different columns 14 and 9), how can I have the total number on the Y axis adding up to 23 and not the larger of the two columns? Hope this makes sense. BR Jack. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Making-...

latex(s6a2,title="",caption="Baseline vs zonr",file="",label="Base",long=TRUE,landscape=F, middle.bold=TRUE,here=T, + ,size="smaller[5]",outer.size="smaller",Nsize="smaller",midsize="smaller") "latex" is not reconized \as a internalor external command , un programma eseguibile o un file batch. Warning message: In shell(cmd, wait = TRUE, intern = output) : 'cd "C:\DOCUME~1\...

What's the logic behind the following, and where can I find any documentation about it? In particular, why are 2:9 - as characters - not regarded as being smaller than 10? # R-Code: a <- as.character(1:12) a < 10 # [1] TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE Thanks in advance! Niklaus

Hi, I'd like to view the Screen resolution in smaller text on my server terminal. The server is not installed with any GUI so it's in plain text mode. Thanks. Sam --------------------------------- NOTE: The information contained in this document and its attachments, if any, may be confidential and/or proprietary and is intended for the use of...

...5 unassigned wm 0 0 0 6 unassigned wm 0 0 0 8 reserved wm 312483583 8.00MB 312499966 So it seems that two of the disks are slightly different models and are about 40mb smaller then the original disks. I know I can just add a larger disk but I would rather user the hardware I have if possible. 1) Is there anyway to replace the failed disk with one of the spares? 2) Can I recreate the zpool using 3 of the original disks and one of the slightly smaller spares? Will zpool/...

...nightly, we have a certain user's mailbox that will not properly sync and the logs give me this error (user private info redacted): Error: Mailbox USER/MAILBOX: UID=79: read(/vmail/domain.org/user/.MAILBOX/cur/1575914253.M611834P7822.triata4,S=41893,W=42718:2,Sc) failed: Cached message size smaller than expected (41893 < 41897, box=USER/MAILBOX, UID=79) (read reason=mail stream) I have deleted the dovecot indexes in the synced backup of this mailbox, as well as in the actual user's mailbox itself and I'm still getting this error. What am I missing? Thank you for your help here...