Virtualization - May 2009 - [PATCH] virtio_blk: add missing __dev{init,exit} markings

On Mon, 18 May 2009 05:09:09 pm Mike Frysinger wrote:
> -static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +static int __devinit virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
This makes sense, I think, but then it implies that virtio_dev_probe() should 
also be __devinit, right?

And I look at pci_bus_probe(), and it's not __devinit.

Is the PCI code just slack?
Rusty.

On Wed, 20 May 2009 00:10:51 +0930
Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2009 05:09:09 pm Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > -static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > +static int __devinit virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> 
> This makes sense, I think, but then it implies that
> virtio_dev_probe() should also be __devinit, right?
> 
> And I look at pci_bus_probe(), and it's not __devinit.
> 
> Is the PCI code just slack?
I wouldn't be surprised if some annotations were missing or incorrect
given the churn in hotplug lately, but I can't find that particular
symbol...

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center