Dor Laor
2007-Dec-21 07:27 UTC
[kvm-devel] [Virtio-for-kvm] [PATCH 12/13] [Mostly resend] virtio additions
From 20a01e0c24f47e9805a88bebc9310163f99b5e99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dor Laor <dor.laor@qumranet.com> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:35:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Handle module unload Add the device release function. Signed-off-by: Dor Laor <dor.laor@qumranet.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 7 +++++++ drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c index 303cb6f..212f4e3 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c @@ -123,6 +123,11 @@ void unregister_virtio_driver(struct virtio_driver *driver) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_virtio_driver); +static void virtio_device_release(struct device *_d) +{ + pr_debug("%s\n" , __FUNCTION__); +} + int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev) { int err; @@ -133,6 +138,8 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev) /* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */ add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE); + + dev->dev.release = virtio_device_release; /* device_register() causes the bus infrastructure to look for a * matching driver. */ err = device_register(&dev->dev); diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c index 7118215..60f2b1f 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c @@ -72,12 +72,18 @@ static struct pci_device_id virtio_pci_id_table[] = { MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, virtio_pci_id_table); +static void virtio_pci_root_release(struct device *d) +{ + pr_debug("%s\n", __FUNCTION__); +} + /* A PCI device has it's own struct device and so does a virtio device so * we create a place for the virtio devices to show up in sysfs. I think it * would make more sense for virtio to not insist on having it's own device. */ static struct device virtio_pci_root = { .parent = NULL, .bus_id = "virtio-pci", + .release = virtio_pci_root_release, }; /* Unique numbering for devices under the kvm root */ @@ -358,6 +364,7 @@ static void __devexit virtio_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pci_dev) pci_iounmap(pci_dev, vp_dev->ioaddr); pci_release_regions(pci_dev); pci_disable_device(pci_dev); + unregister_virtio_device(&vp_dev->vdev); kfree(vp_dev); } -- 1.5.3.3
Rusty Russell
2008-Jan-23 17:01 UTC
[kvm-devel] [Virtio-for-kvm] [PATCH 12/13] [Mostly resend] virtio additions
On Saturday 22 December 2007 02:27:04 Dor Laor wrote:> From 20a01e0c24f47e9805a88bebc9310163f99b5e99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Dor Laor <dor.laor@qumranet.com> > Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:35:35 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] Handle module unload Add the device release function.Hi Dor, It looks like this isn't needed in my latest queue, so I've dropped it. Cheers, Rusty.> Signed-off-by: Dor Laor <dor.laor@qumranet.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 7 +++++++ > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 7 +++++++ > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c > index 303cb6f..212f4e3 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c > @@ -123,6 +123,11 @@ void unregister_virtio_driver(struct virtio_driver > *driver) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_virtio_driver); > > +static void virtio_device_release(struct device *_d) > +{ > + pr_debug("%s\n" , __FUNCTION__); > +} > + > int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev) > { > int err; > @@ -133,6 +138,8 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev) > /* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */ > add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE); > > + > + dev->dev.release = virtio_device_release; > /* device_register() causes the bus infrastructure to look for a > * matching driver. */ > err = device_register(&dev->dev); > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c > index 7118215..60f2b1f 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c > @@ -72,12 +72,18 @@ static struct pci_device_id virtio_pci_id_table[] = { > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, virtio_pci_id_table); > > +static void virtio_pci_root_release(struct device *d) > +{ > + pr_debug("%s\n", __FUNCTION__); > +} > + > /* A PCI device has it's own struct device and so does a virtio device so > * we create a place for the virtio devices to show up in sysfs. I > think it > * would make more sense for virtio to not insist on having it's own > device. */ > static struct device virtio_pci_root = { > .parent = NULL, > .bus_id = "virtio-pci", > + .release = virtio_pci_root_release, > }; > > /* Unique numbering for devices under the kvm root */ > @@ -358,6 +364,7 @@ static void __devexit virtio_pci_remove(struct > pci_dev *pci_dev) > pci_iounmap(pci_dev, vp_dev->ioaddr); > pci_release_regions(pci_dev); > pci_disable_device(pci_dev); > + unregister_virtio_device(&vp_dev->vdev); > kfree(vp_dev); > }
Maybe Matching Threads
- [kvm-devel] [Virtio-for-kvm] [PATCH 12/13] [Mostly resend] virtio additions
- [kvm-devel] [Virtio-for-kvm] [PATCH 13/13] [Mostly resend] virtio additions
- [kvm-devel] [Virtio-for-kvm] [PATCH 13/13] [Mostly resend] virtio additions
- [virtio-net][PATCH] Don't arm tx hrtimer with a constant 500us each transmit
- [virtio-net][PATCH] Don't arm tx hrtimer with a constant 500us each transmit