Dor Laor
2007-Dec-21 07:27 UTC
[kvm-devel] [Virtio-for-kvm] [PATCH 12/13] [Mostly resend] virtio additions
From 20a01e0c24f47e9805a88bebc9310163f99b5e99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dor Laor <dor.laor@qumranet.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:35:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Handle module unload Add the device release function.
Signed-off-by: Dor Laor <dor.laor@qumranet.com>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 7 +++++++
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
index 303cb6f..212f4e3 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
@@ -123,6 +123,11 @@ void unregister_virtio_driver(struct virtio_driver
*driver)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_virtio_driver);
+static void virtio_device_release(struct device *_d)
+{
+ pr_debug("%s\n" , __FUNCTION__);
+}
+
int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
{
int err;
@@ -133,6 +138,8 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
/* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */
add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);
+
+ dev->dev.release = virtio_device_release;
/* device_register() causes the bus infrastructure to look for a
* matching driver. */
err = device_register(&dev->dev);
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
index 7118215..60f2b1f 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
@@ -72,12 +72,18 @@ static struct pci_device_id virtio_pci_id_table[] = {
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, virtio_pci_id_table);
+static void virtio_pci_root_release(struct device *d)
+{
+ pr_debug("%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
+}
+
/* A PCI device has it's own struct device and so does a virtio device so
* we create a place for the virtio devices to show up in sysfs. I
think it
* would make more sense for virtio to not insist on having it's own
device. */
static struct device virtio_pci_root = {
.parent = NULL,
.bus_id = "virtio-pci",
+ .release = virtio_pci_root_release,
};
/* Unique numbering for devices under the kvm root */
@@ -358,6 +364,7 @@ static void __devexit virtio_pci_remove(struct
pci_dev *pci_dev)
pci_iounmap(pci_dev, vp_dev->ioaddr);
pci_release_regions(pci_dev);
pci_disable_device(pci_dev);
+ unregister_virtio_device(&vp_dev->vdev);
kfree(vp_dev);
}
--
1.5.3.3
Rusty Russell
2008-Jan-23 17:01 UTC
[kvm-devel] [Virtio-for-kvm] [PATCH 12/13] [Mostly resend] virtio additions
On Saturday 22 December 2007 02:27:04 Dor Laor wrote:> From 20a01e0c24f47e9805a88bebc9310163f99b5e99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Dor Laor <dor.laor@qumranet.com> > Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:35:35 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] Handle module unload Add the device release function.Hi Dor, It looks like this isn't needed in my latest queue, so I've dropped it. Cheers, Rusty.> Signed-off-by: Dor Laor <dor.laor@qumranet.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 7 +++++++ > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 7 +++++++ > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c > index 303cb6f..212f4e3 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c > @@ -123,6 +123,11 @@ void unregister_virtio_driver(struct virtio_driver > *driver) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_virtio_driver); > > +static void virtio_device_release(struct device *_d) > +{ > + pr_debug("%s\n" , __FUNCTION__); > +} > + > int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev) > { > int err; > @@ -133,6 +138,8 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev) > /* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */ > add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE); > > + > + dev->dev.release = virtio_device_release; > /* device_register() causes the bus infrastructure to look for a > * matching driver. */ > err = device_register(&dev->dev); > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c > index 7118215..60f2b1f 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c > @@ -72,12 +72,18 @@ static struct pci_device_id virtio_pci_id_table[] = { > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, virtio_pci_id_table); > > +static void virtio_pci_root_release(struct device *d) > +{ > + pr_debug("%s\n", __FUNCTION__); > +} > + > /* A PCI device has it's own struct device and so does a virtio device so > * we create a place for the virtio devices to show up in sysfs. I > think it > * would make more sense for virtio to not insist on having it's own > device. */ > static struct device virtio_pci_root = { > .parent = NULL, > .bus_id = "virtio-pci", > + .release = virtio_pci_root_release, > }; > > /* Unique numbering for devices under the kvm root */ > @@ -358,6 +364,7 @@ static void __devexit virtio_pci_remove(struct > pci_dev *pci_dev) > pci_iounmap(pci_dev, vp_dev->ioaddr); > pci_release_regions(pci_dev); > pci_disable_device(pci_dev); > + unregister_virtio_device(&vp_dev->vdev); > kfree(vp_dev); > }
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [kvm-devel] [Virtio-for-kvm] [PATCH 12/13] [Mostly resend] virtio additions
- [kvm-devel] [Virtio-for-kvm] [PATCH 13/13] [Mostly resend] virtio additions
- [kvm-devel] [Virtio-for-kvm] [PATCH 13/13] [Mostly resend] virtio additions
- [virtio-net][PATCH] Don't arm tx hrtimer with a constant 500us each transmit
- [virtio-net][PATCH] Don't arm tx hrtimer with a constant 500us each transmit