Is there any way to get better encoding speed out of ffmpeg2theora? eg: <snip> Duration: 00:57:04.92, <snip> ET: 02:06:24 here is the command: ffmpeg2theora --soft-target -V303 -v4 -F25 -K25 --croptop 8 --cropleft 2 --cropright 2 -x360 -y288 --deinterlace --aspect 4:3 -H24000 -A56 --optimize "<filename.mpg>" also the bitrate, 300kbits == 297kb (3 kbit less) tom_a_sparks Light travels faster then sound, which is why some people appear bright, until you hear them speak
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 14:38, Tom Sparks <tom_a_sparks at yahoo.com.au> wrote:> Is there any way to get better encoding speed out of ffmpeg2theora? > > eg: <snip> Duration: 00:57:04.92, <snip> ET: 02:06:24 > > here is the command: > ffmpeg2theora --soft-target -V303 -v4 -F25 -K25 --croptop 8 --cropleft 2 --cropright 2 -x360 -y288 --deinterlace --aspect 4:3 -H24000 -A56 --optimize "<filename.mpg>"You use --optimize, which makes it do slow tests. Try leaving that out. --optimize optimize video output filesize (slower) (same as speedlevel 0) --speedlevel encoding is faster with higher values the cost is quality and bandwidth - 0: Slowest (best) - 1: Enable early skip (default) - 2: Disable motion compensation -- Remco
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 05:38 -0700, Tom Sparks wrote:> Is there any way to get better encoding speed out of ffmpeg2theora?I'd love to see it multithreaded someday. My machine has 8 CPU cores but I don't always have 8 videos to encode... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora/attachments/20100624/66ad289b/attachment.pgp
Seemingly Similar Threads
- ffmpeg2theora start and end time support - patch
- Theora encode/decode performance is poor with resolution 640X480
- usage of --two-pass parameter with ffmpeg2theora?
- Strange results encoding with latest ffmpeg2theora-0.24 and playback on Directshow through Winamp
- strange strsplit gsub problem 0 is this a bug or a string length limitation?