On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:04 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote:> On 05/27/2013 04:49 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: >> >> 115200 = 0x1C200 so "SERIAL 1 115200" should be setting the bit rate >> to 9600 and the flow control to 0x200. >> > > I really hope that is not true.Should "SERIAL port [[baudrate] flowcontrol]" actually be "SERIAL port [baudrate [flowcontrol]]"? -- -Gene
On 05/27/2013 11:01 AM, Gene Cumm wrote:> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:04 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: >> On 05/27/2013 04:49 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: >>> >>> 115200 = 0x1C200 so "SERIAL 1 115200" should be setting the bit rate >>> to 9600 and the flow control to 0x200. >>> >> >> I really hope that is not true. > > Should "SERIAL port [[baudrate] flowcontrol]" actually be "SERIAL port > [baudrate [flowcontrol]]"? >Yes. -hpa
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:03 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote:> On 05/27/2013 11:01 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: >> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:04 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: >>> On 05/27/2013 04:49 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: >>>> >>>> 115200 = 0x1C200 so "SERIAL 1 115200" should be setting the bit rate >>>> to 9600 and the flow control to 0x200. >>>> >>> >>> I really hope that is not true. >> >> Should "SERIAL port [[baudrate] flowcontrol]" actually be "SERIAL port >> [baudrate [flowcontrol]]"? >> > > Yes.Was there ever a time that the behavior was "SERIAL port [[baudrate] flowcontrol]" or has it been misdocumented for years? -- -Gene