04.02.2016 22:05, Jean-Marc Valin ?????:> I can see how that would cause multiple rate changes. At the same time, > since this would be using the interpolated code (unless you're really > lucky with the rate), the cost shouldn't be too high. BTW, do you know > how often the rate gets updated?The rate is, by default, updated every 10 seconds. And sometimes (especially with the not-so-recent unreviewed patches) we do get lucky and resample from 44100 to 44100 Hz, and the next 10 seconds from 44100 to 44101 Hz. -- Alexander E. Patrakov
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov at gmail.com> wrote:> 04.02.2016 22:05, Jean-Marc Valin ?????: >> I can see how that would cause multiple rate changes. At the same time, >> since this would be using the interpolated code (unless you're really >> lucky with the rate), the cost shouldn't be too high. BTW, do you know >> how often the rate gets updated? > > The rate is, by default, updated every 10 seconds. And sometimes > (especially with the not-so-recent unreviewed patches) we do get luckyWhich patches are you referring to?> and resample from 44100 to 44100 Hz, and the next 10 seconds from 44100 > to 44101 Hz. > > -- > Alexander E. Patrakov > _______________________________________________ > Speex-dev mailing list > Speex-dev at xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
06.02.2016 01:12, Tristan Matthews ?????:> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov > <patrakov at gmail.com> wrote: >> 04.02.2016 22:05, Jean-Marc Valin ?????: >>> I can see how that would cause multiple rate changes. At the same time, >>> since this would be using the interpolated code (unless you're really >>> lucky with the rate), the cost shouldn't be too high. BTW, do you know >>> how often the rate gets updated? >> >> The rate is, by default, updated every 10 seconds. And sometimes >> (especially with the not-so-recent unreviewed patches) we do get lucky > > Which patches are you referring to?"Make module-loopback honor requested latency (v5)" by Georg Chini http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2015-February/023272.html It appears that v6 was only sent to me privately, and I don't have enough knowledge to reject or approve it anyway. -- Alexander E. Patrakov