Hi Mark,
the documentation (section 3.2.1) states:
"The single that will affect the CPU usage of Speex the most is whether it
is compiled for floating point or fixed-point. [...] On the x86 architecture,
floating-point is generally faster, but not always. "
And:
"Until the VBR feature is ported to fixed-point, you will also need to
configure with ?disable-vbr or define DISABLE_VBR."
So at least variable bit rate is not supported with FIXED_POINT.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org] On
Behalf Of Mark Palkow
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:52 AM
To: speex-dev at xiph.org
Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] High CPU usage
We have that problem too.
Not with USB headset only. Some sound cards deliver all 0 samples when no
microphone is connected.
Using FIXED_POINT solved it. But what are the drawbacks of FIXED_POINT in
comparison to FLOATING_POINT?
Mark
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org] Im
Auftrag von Jozsef Vass
Gesendet: Freitag, 25. September 2009 23:43
An: mark_schilling at gmx.de
Cc: speex-dev at xiph.org
Betreff: Re: [Speex-dev] High CPU usage
I have run into the same issue. Before sending a frame to encoder, I
calculate the energy. If it is less than a small threshold, I simply replace
this frame with "silence frame," which is 320 random samples of values
smaller than 3 (16 kHz).
BTW, I have only experience this problem with certain USB headsets that
provide you all 0 samples when muted.
Jozsef
_______________________________________________
Speex-dev mailing list
Speex-dev at xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
_______________________________________________
Speex-dev mailing list
Speex-dev at xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
--
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 -
sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atbrowser
