Congrats JM. You certainly deserved to get the payload format approved. If I'm not being too much of a pest, I was wondering how close Speex 1.2 is to being a full-fledged release. I know that your focus these days is on CELT (and I'm glad for that) but I was wondering if you had any plans for any real changes or fixes to Speex in the near term. For my project I make a lot of changes to the code (mostly so that SSE support is selected at run-time) so I don't like to get new code very often. But Speex looks pretty stable now and I think it's a good time to get the latest and greatest unless you've got some plans on the drawing board for improvements. In any case I think I speak for all of us out here that we really appreciate all your hard work. John Ridges
John Ridges a ?crit :> Congrats JM. You certainly deserved to get the payload format approved.Thanks> If I'm not being too much of a pest, I was wondering how close Speex 1.2 > is to being a full-fledged release. I know that your focus these days is > on CELT (and I'm glad for that) but I was wondering if you had any plans > for any real changes or fixes to Speex in the near term. For my project > I make a lot of changes to the code (mostly so that SSE support is > selected at run-time) so I don't like to get new code very often. But > Speex looks pretty stable now and I think it's a good time to get the > latest and greatest unless you've got some plans on the drawing board > for improvements. In any case I think I speak for all of us out here > that we really appreciate all your hard work.I don't expect much changes to the codec until 1.2. It would mostly be around the preprocessor and AEC. Jean-Marc