Hi all, I?m trying to send 2 frames per RTP packet. One frame is current frame , the other one is previous frame for redundancy. Can you give some recomendation?for beginning ? Thank you very much? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20090118/b05876a8/attachment.htm
Anna White wrote:> Hi all, > I?m trying to send 2 frames per RTP packet. One frame is current frame > , the other one is previous frame for redundancy. > Can you give some recomendation for beginning ? > Thank you very muchThis isn't really a speex issue. Its purely an RTP issue. RFC2198 defines a way to do redundancy with RTP, and that is what you should be using to pack your redundant frames into packets. Steve
Just as a convenience, I thought I'd post a link to the RFC in question: ietf.org/rfc/rfc2198.txt?number=2198 On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Steve Underwood <steveu at coppice.org> wrote:> Anna White wrote: > > Hi all, > > I?m trying to send 2 frames per RTP packet. One frame is current frame > > , the other one is previous frame for redundancy. > > Can you give some recomendation for beginning ? > > Thank you very much > This isn't really a speex issue. Its purely an RTP issue. RFC2198 > defines a way to do redundancy with RTP, and that is what you should be > using to pack your redundant frames into packets. > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > Speex-dev mailing list > Speex-dev at xiph.org > lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev >-- Keith Kyzivat SIPez LLC. SIP VoIP, IM and Presence Consulting SIPez.com tel: +1 (617) 273-4000 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20090119/7b6a09e4/attachment.htm