Speex dev - Jan 2009 - Redundant frames

Hi all,
I?m trying to send 2 frames per RTP packet. One frame is current frame , the
other one is previous frame for redundancy.
Can you give some recomendation?for beginning ?
Thank you very much?


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20090118/b05876a8/attachment.htm

Anna White wrote:
> Hi all,
> I?m trying to send 2 frames per RTP packet. One frame is current frame 
> , the other one is previous frame for redundancy.
> Can you give some recomendation for beginning ?
> Thank you very much 
This isn't really a speex issue. Its purely an RTP issue. RFC2198 
defines a way to do redundancy with RTP, and that is what you should be 
using to pack your redundant frames into packets.

Steve

Just as a convenience, I thought I'd post a link to the RFC in question:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2198.txt?number=2198

On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Steve Underwood <steveu at coppice.org>
wrote:
> Anna White wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I?m trying to send 2 frames per RTP packet. One frame is current frame
> > , the other one is previous frame for redundancy.
> > Can you give some recomendation for beginning ?
> > Thank you very much
> This isn't really a speex issue. Its purely an RTP issue. RFC2198
> defines a way to do redundancy with RTP, and that is what you should be
> using to pack your redundant frames into packets.
>
> Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing list
> Speex-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
>


-- 
Keith Kyzivat

SIPez LLC.
SIP VoIP, IM and Presence Consulting
http://www.SIPez.com
tel: +1 (617) 273-4000
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20090119/7b6a09e4/attachment.htm