search for: redundant

...struction Selection 97.2730 ( 7.9%) 0.7656 ( 2.2%) 98.0386 ( 7.7%) 98.0010 ( 7.7%) Global Value Numbering 62.4091 ( 5.1%) 0.4779 ( 1.4%) 62.8870 ( 4.9%) 62.8665 ( 5.0%) Function Integration/Inlining 58.6923 ( 4.8%) 0.4767 ( 1.4%) 59.1690 ( 4.7%) 59.1323 ( 4.7%) Combine redundant instructions 53.9602 ( 4.4%) 0.6163 ( 1.8%) 54.5765 ( 4.3%) 54.5409 ( 4.3%) Combine redundant instructions 51.0470 ( 4.1%) 0.5703 ( 1.6%) 51.6173 ( 4.1%) 51.5425 ( 4.1%) Loop Strength Reduction 47.4067 ( 3.8%) 1.3040 ( 3.7%) 48.7106 ( 3.8%) 48.7034 ( 3.8%) Greedy Regis...

...7656 ( 2.2%) 98.0386 ( 7.7%) 98.0010 ( >> 7.7%) Global Value Numbering >> 62.4091 ( 5.1%) 0.4779 ( 1.4%) 62.8870 ( 4.9%) 62.8665 ( >> 5.0%) Function Integration/Inlining >> 58.6923 ( 4.8%) 0.4767 ( 1.4%) 59.1690 ( 4.7%) 59.1323 ( >> 4.7%) Combine redundant instructions >> 53.9602 ( 4.4%) 0.6163 ( 1.8%) 54.5765 ( 4.3%) 54.5409 ( >> 4.3%) Combine redundant instructions >> 51.0470 ( 4.1%) 0.5703 ( 1.6%) 51.6173 ( 4.1%) 51.5425 ( >> 4.1%) Loop Strength Reduction >> 47.4067 ( 3.8%) 1.3040 ( 3.7%) 48.71...

...7.2730 ( 7.9%) 0.7656 ( 2.2%) 98.0386 ( 7.7%) 98.0010 ( > 7.7%) Global Value Numbering > 62.4091 ( 5.1%) 0.4779 ( 1.4%) 62.8870 ( 4.9%) 62.8665 ( > 5.0%) Function Integration/Inlining > 58.6923 ( 4.8%) 0.4767 ( 1.4%) 59.1690 ( 4.7%) 59.1323 ( > 4.7%) Combine redundant instructions > 53.9602 ( 4.4%) 0.6163 ( 1.8%) 54.5765 ( 4.3%) 54.5409 ( > 4.3%) Combine redundant instructions > 51.0470 ( 4.1%) 0.5703 ( 1.6%) 51.6173 ( 4.1%) 51.5425 ( > 4.1%) Loop Strength Reduction > 47.4067 ( 3.8%) 1.3040 ( 3.7%) 48.7106 ( 3.8%) 48.7034...

...7.2730 ( 7.9%) 0.7656 ( 2.2%) 98.0386 ( 7.7%) 98.0010 ( > 7.7%) Global Value Numbering > 62.4091 ( 5.1%) 0.4779 ( 1.4%) 62.8870 ( 4.9%) 62.8665 ( > 5.0%) Function Integration/Inlining > 58.6923 ( 4.8%) 0.4767 ( 1.4%) 59.1690 ( 4.7%) 59.1323 ( > 4.7%) Combine redundant instructions > 53.9602 ( 4.4%) 0.6163 ( 1.8%) 54.5765 ( 4.3%) 54.5409 ( > 4.3%) Combine redundant instructions > 51.0470 ( 4.1%) 0.5703 ( 1.6%) 51.6173 ( 4.1%) 51.5425 ( > 4.1%) Loop Strength Reduction > 47.4067 ( 3.8%) 1.3040 ( 3.7%) 48.7106 ( 3.8%) 48.7034...

Hello, My host just had a faulty power supply and therefore, my Asterisk server was down for 7 hours. It was a Sunday so no one was making calls, however if it happened during the week, I'd have problems. I was trying to find a whitepaper or advice on how to set up two Asterisk servers to provide some redundancy. I've been googling "asterisk redundancy" but all I've found

...red for replication Available storage 1TB Redundancy 2 x copies The above is straight forward. What we want to achieve is Add more servers (for the sake of the exercise specs will be identical) Keep the same level of redundancy N+2 Increase storage If 2 more servers were installed (5 x 1TB) - (2 redundant) = 3TB Available If 4 more servers were installed (7 x 1TB) - (2 redundant) = 5TB Available and so on Is this possible with glusterfs and any suggestions on how to achieve this. Please keep in mind we are expecting data growth and would like to keep adding servers to increase storage. Regards St...

...fy = TRUE) for (j in 1:ncol(triplets)){ o <- order(triplets[,j]) triplets[,j] <- triplets[o,j] count.vec <- rep(1, ncol(triplets)) } if (is.null(all.count.vec)){ all.count.vec <- count.vec all.triplets <- triplets } else { redundant.vec <- NULL for (k in 1:ncol(all.triplets)){ for (m in 1:ncol(triplets)){ if (length(intersect(triplets[,m], all.triplets[,k] == M))){ all.count.vec[k] <- all.count.vec[k] + 1 redundant.vec <- c(redundant.vec, m) } }...

...30 ( 7.9%) 0.7656 ( 2.2%) 98.0386 ( 7.7%) 98.0010 ( > 7.7%) Global Value Numbering > 62.4091 ( 5.1%) 0.4779 ( 1.4%) 62.8870 ( 4.9%) 62.8665 ( > 5.0%) Function Integration/Inlining > 58.6923 ( 4.8%) 0.4767 ( 1.4%) 59.1690 ( 4.7%) 59.1323 ( > 4.7%) Combine redundant instructions > 53.9602 ( 4.4%) 0.6163 ( 1.8%) 54.5765 ( 4.3%) 54.5409 ( > 4.3%) Combine redundant instructions > 51.0470 ( 4.1%) 0.5703 ( 1.6%) 51.6173 ( 4.1%) 51.5425 ( > 4.1%) Loop Strength Reduction > 47.4067 ( 3.8%) 1.3040 ( 3.7%) 48.7106 ( 3.8%) 4...

...2730 ( 7.9%) 0.7656 ( 2.2%) 98.0386 ( 7.7%) 98.0010 ( > 7.7%) Global Value Numbering > 62.4091 ( 5.1%) 0.4779 ( 1.4%) 62.8870 ( 4.9%) 62.8665 ( > 5.0%) Function Integration/Inlining > 58.6923 ( 4.8%) 0.4767 ( 1.4%) 59.1690 ( 4.7%) 59.1323 ( > 4.7%) Combine redundant instructions > 53.9602 ( 4.4%) 0.6163 ( 1.8%) 54.5765 ( 4.3%) 54.5409 ( > 4.3%) Combine redundant instructions > 51.0470 ( 4.1%) 0.5703 ( 1.6%) 51.6173 ( 4.1%) 51.5425 ( > 4.1%) Loop Strength Reduction > 47.4067 ( 3.8%) 1.3040 ( 3.7%) 48.7106 ( 3.8%) 48.7...

I'm trying to justify a GlusterFS storage system for my technology development group and I want to get some clarification on something that I can't seem to figure out architecture wise... My storage system will be rather large. Significant fraction of a petabyte and will require scaling in size for at least one decade. from what I understand GlusterFS achieves redundancy through

Dear everyone in the Mailing list:   It is easy to get the unique elements in a column. But I would like to get rid of those rows that the elements of this column are redundant. Or sometimes, to have a look at the rows that the elements of this column are redundant is also important. I guess it boils down to throw out the index of the redundant elements.   With millions of rows, how can I efficiently perform the task?   Thank you in advance.   Boshao [[alternat...

...7.2730 ( 7.9%) 0.7656 ( 2.2%) 98.0386 ( 7.7%) 98.0010 ( > 7.7%) Global Value Numbering > 62.4091 ( 5.1%) 0.4779 ( 1.4%) 62.8870 ( 4.9%) 62.8665 ( > 5.0%) Function Integration/Inlining > 58.6923 ( 4.8%) 0.4767 ( 1.4%) 59.1690 ( 4.7%) 59.1323 ( > 4.7%) Combine redundant instructions > 53.9602 ( 4.4%) 0.6163 ( 1.8%) 54.5765 ( 4.3%) 54.5409 ( > 4.3%) Combine redundant instructions > 51.0470 ( 4.1%) 0.5703 ( 1.6%) 51.6173 ( 4.1%) 51.5425 ( > 4.1%) Loop Strength Reduction > 47.4067 ( 3.8%) 1.3040 ( 3.7%) 48.7106 ( 3.8%) 48.7034...

I've been reading that it's possible to set up a system with multiple NIC to provide redundant internet connectivity such that it will switch to a secondary connection if the primary ISP fails. Is it possible in a similar way to setup redundant LAN routing? I read that it is possible to aggregate/bond multiple NIC to stackable switches that support link aggregation and redundancy. But if on...

I am setting up 2 Vyatta routers that will serve as redundant failover core routers out to the backbone of our ISP. They will be serving for routing between other branches and the ISP and bandwidth management. I am trying to differentiate between the plethora of information about having redundant, automatic failover routers and pretty much decided on VRRP fo...

Hi All, I'm interested in how people are "clustering" Asterisk, if that's possible, or how you might be achieving a redundant solution. I've a single Asterisk server driving the company. Its well backed-up, and I've a cloned machine that (in theory) with a DNS change could take over operations. However I'd like to achieve something more automated if possible. I know that some of my VoIP trunk providers &quo...

Hi all, I?m trying to send 2 frames per RTP packet. One frame is current frame , the other one is previous frame for redundancy. Can you give some recomendation?for beginning ? Thank you very much? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20090118/b05876a8/attachment.htm

...RDA in the pass I mentioned and it works great. Thanks Sam! Regarding the root cause, I didn't see anything obviously suboptimal not in the copy coalescing or the register allocation, at least in my previous example. Alternatively we might want to improve what we pass onto RA: i.e. remove the redundant copy earlier. At this point however it doesn't (obviously) look like one (it still using different vregs) which suggests it might require a bit more of work to discover something that will ultimately lead to a redundant copy. I will investigate this option as well. I'll take a look at the...

Hi all, I am trying to come up with an architecture that has some redundancy. The idea is to hook up the two GbE LAN interfaces of a CentOS server to two Gigabit Ethernet switches. In case one switch goes down, there is a redundant path (the server is redundant too). Here is the idea: ----------- | GbE | PCs ------------| switch |------------ | | ----------- | | ----------------- --...

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > Also, if these redundant expressions involve induction variables, then that's something that the IndVarSimplify is already supposed to do, and if it is missing cases, then we should improve that pass (and, thus, folding what you've done into IndVarSimplify might be the right way to go). Hal, thanks for the info....

...always... Cheers. ________________________________ From: Roger Ferrer Ibáñez <rofirrim at gmail.com> Sent: 16 March 2020 08:53 To: Sjoerd Meijer <Sjoerd.Meijer at arm.com> Cc: LLVM-Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; Sam Parker <Sam.Parker at arm.com> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Redundant copies At this point however it doesn't (obviously) look like one (it still using different vregs) which suggests it might require a bit more of work to discover something that will ultimately lead to a redundant copy. I will investigate this option as well. I correct myself here: in the MIR...