seif,
what complexity setting are you using? try complexity 0. i would imagine
that even that would require more than 96mhz to execute in real-time. you
are actually doing quite well at 13 msec.
i haven't benchmarked the latest builds. i believe that the integer
optimizations are quite good now.
the earlier builds (1.1.6 and around) took a 133 Mhz processor (the MPX200
from Motorola was my first production grade deployment) running nearly full
speed.
- farhan
On Jan 17, 2008 9:07 PM, seif jlassi <25jlassis@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm working on implementing the speex codec on ARM966E @ 96Mhz. For the
> encoding I found that 20ms of sample voice takes 13ms to be encoded. The
> goal of my project is to built an VoIP application based on ARM966E but
with
> the actually performance it's not possible :(
>
> My question is what is approximately the speex encoding time with
> narrowband mode on ARM9 (ARM926 or ARM966), and please did anyone had made
a
> benchmarking about MPU speex consummation. Thank you for all.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Seif
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing list
> Speex-dev@xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20080117/b16e99fb/attachment.htm