Can you do another release of the unstable branch that has everything merged in? The run-time flags for SSE / ASM and your new intrinsics. If you have all the sections written, we will happily test them on windows QA machines. Is there anything in particular that you are looking for in testing? Or just that it works? Aron Rosenberg SightSpeed <p>At 01:17 PM 1/18/2004 -0500, you wrote:> > > OK, so here's a first start. I've translated to intrinsics the asm I > > > sent 1-2 days ago. The result is about 5% slower than the pure asm > > > approach, so it's not too bad (SSE asm is 2x faster than x87). Note that > > > unlike the previous version which had a kludge to work with order 8 > > > (required for wideband), this version only works with order 10, so it > > > will only work for narrowband. > > > > Will this work on linux as well? > >I'm developing this with Linux, so there's no problem for that (you need >to compile with -march=pentium3). It should also work work for Windows >(now that the inline asm has been removed), but I haven't tested. Of >course, I'd like more testing both on Linux and Windows to make sure I >haven't broken anything. > > Jean-Marc > >-- >Jean-Marc Valin, M.Sc.A., ing. jr. >LABORIUS (http://www.gel.usherb.ca/laborius) >Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
Le dim 18/01/2004 à 16:26, Aron Rosenberg a écrit :> Can you do another release of the unstable branch that has everything > merged in? The run-time flags for SSE / ASM and your new intrinsics. If you > have all the sections written, we will happily test them on windows QA > machines.Though I'm not yet ready to include run-time SSE flags, I'll try to release something soon. Since all the SSE code is now converted to using intrinsics, it should now (in theory) work fine on windows.> Is there anything in particular that you are looking for in testing? Or > just that it works?Please test that everything that worked previously still works. Using either the regular version, the SSE version or the fixed-point version. Report any problem. If everything works fine, I'll try releasing 1.1.4 this week. Jean-Marc -- Jean-Marc Valin, M.Sc.A., ing. jr. LABORIUS (http://www.gel.usherb.ca/laborius) Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 190 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée. Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20040118/25df3504/signature-0001.pgp
> > OK, so here's a first start. I've translated to intrinsics the asm I > > sent 1-2 days ago. The result is about 5% slower than the pure asm > > approach, so it's not too bad (SSE asm is 2x faster than x87). Note that > > unlike the previous version which had a kludge to work with order 8 > > (required for wideband), this version only works with order 10, so it > > will only work for narrowband. > > Will this work on linux as well?I'm developing this with Linux, so there's no problem for that (you need to compile with -march=pentium3). It should also work work for Windows (now that the inline asm has been removed), but I haven't tested. Of course, I'd like more testing both on Linux and Windows to make sure I haven't broken anything. Jean-Marc -- Jean-Marc Valin, M.Sc.A., ing. jr. LABORIUS (http://www.gel.usherb.ca/laborius) Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 190 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée. Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20040118/fe2f0c4c/signature-0001.pgp