similar to: Bind Variables in Active Record

Here''s the text of a quick note I''ve added to the Inheritance wiki page. I''m actually proposing that it would be a good idea to drop automatic single table inheritance and force people to declare it explicitly. There are two reasons for this: 1. Implicitly doing it unnecessarially limits your use of inheritance where you really need it: in your object-oriented

I have a module that sends email to the members that have subscribed to my site. When it runs through and sends them all emails, it crashes with certain emails with: 550 <email-x+rxnKfQbAxWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table This is on the other end right? And even so, is there a way to suppress it?

Hello- I''m new to the ruby-based schemas and migrations. As I''m looking over examples and such online, I see that many of them don''t make use of schema-enforced attributes. For example, instead of: t.column "post_id", :integer, :default => 0, :null => false They do: t.column "post_id", :integer So I''m wondering -- is this

I am going on Tuesday. Anybody else here going? Gleb

Does anyone know how to view the new source in IE after an AJAX update? When I "view -> source" I get the original page source, not the page source as updated. Thanks in advance, Bill -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060403/e8d96b2e/attachment.html

find_by_sql BREAKS THE OOP BEAUTY and perhaps we can solve that. NAMING CONVENTIONS can perhaps make find_by_sql much more clever. lets imagine that relation: publishers <- books <-> authors_books <-> authors -> universities (can''t find something else than university for that last association :) ) imagine we want to fetch every book and every associated

Rails 1.1 was a big upgrade with a lot of new features and we''ve been working hard since its release to polish off the kinks revealed after it was deployed to the masses. Rails 1.1.1 contains fixes for things like Prototype memory leaks in IE 6, Oracle adapter runnings, and a number of compatibility tweaks to make most older applications work. This release still doesn''t work

Hello, I submitted a patch <http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3287> ( http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3287) a couple of days ago. The patch adds some methods into and changes the existing methods in the CaptureHelper module. It should not, as I can see, affect any existing Rails implementations. I added the relevant unit tests and all but one of the tests pass. The test that fails failed

Cheers, I have a problem with 1.0 and a habtm relationship between User and Article. I want to save all articles that users read. I have these models: class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :read_articles, :class_name => "Article", :join_table => "read_articles" ... end class Article < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :readers,

I''m working on a RoR project and a requirement has popped up that would required certain actions to happen at certain time intervals (as opposed to having a user initiate the action). Is there anything similar to Java''s Quartz library, *nix cron, or anything of the like for Rails? I''m certainly willing to help with/test Ruby code if someone on the list is already

Textdrive upgraded to Rails 1.1 already. I have an older rails app, and am now getting the following error: c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-1.3.0 /lib/active_support/depende ncies.rb:112:in `const_missing'': uninitialized constant LoadingModule (NameEr ror) from ./script/../config/environment.rb:91 from

Hello all, I just successfully updated my dev env to Rails 1.0. I then wanted to get .rjs templates working and followed Cody''s instructions at http://www.codyfauser.com/articles/2005/12/02/rails-rjs-templates-plugin . However, when I try to run ''rake test'' I get the following error: (in

I have gotten acts_as_taggable to work for a test application as documented on taggable.rubyforge.org I am following Chad''s excellent examples in ROR Recipes Beta book. I have a few questions and hope that Chad or some other expert can help clarify them. 1. Why is the book suggesting to use taggings table instead of tags_contacts, as mentioned on taggable.rubyforge.org?

Hi, I''m developing an application where I''ll have to store a lot of images coming from the users. And I''m still not sure if I should store them in MySQl as blob or just store them on filesystem. If I store them on filesystem, how to scale when I''ll have to have multiple servers ? Thanks, Pratik -- rm -rf / 2>/dev/null - http://null.in

Hi all, I submitted a patch the other day for an issue I ran into running an "add_column" migration on a sqlite3 database when there is existing data in the table, and the new column has ":null=>false". Details at http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5215. The issue I encountered was not picked due to the unit test not having any actual data in it before running the

I started two weeks ago with rails and im amazed of what can be done in a short time, i already finished the agile development with rails and some of the tutorials at the documentation section of the rubyonrails.com site. But i realize that many of the tutos and examples around the web and books are using earlier versions of rails (0.x.x) and some of that code and coding practices are

Hi all, I''ve more than one rails based applications on my machine. When I upgrade my gems (including rails), I usually have to upgrade each application to be able to continue developing/using it... But some of these web applications don''t need to be up to date. I would be happy enough with older version of rails for these applications (, or I don''t have time to fix

Hello, I have the following output when changing form Active Record 1.0.1 to ActiveRecord 1.6: [error] C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.4.0/lib/action_controller/support/dependencies.rb:24:in `depend_on'': uninitialized constant ActiveRecord::Mixins (ScriptError)\r [error] \tfrom

Hi I updated gem rails today and saw that rails had an update. With the new edition, I get a warning statement printed that was not in the two earlier versions. (No message with either: require_gem ''activerecord'', "= 1.0.0" require_gem ''activerecord'', "= 1.0.0.20041114" ) The code still works, but the warning makes no sense. Plus,

Hey- I ran into to some problems when trying to follow "A tutorial by Rails'' users." When I reached Step Three and executed the controller script as follows: ruby script/generate controller Friends list display new edit I got this error message: C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\rails>ruby script/generate controller Friends list display ne w edit