similar to: Factor Analysis

--=-hiYzUeWcRJ/+kx41aPIZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, on March 10 I filed a wishlist bug report asking for the inclusion of some changes to factanal() and the associated print method. The changes were originally proposed by John Fox in 2005; they make print.factanal() display factor correlations if factanal() is called with rotation =

Hi, I had a look at the MASS4 scripts in the MASS package, in Ch 11.3 Factor Analysis, there is a section of codes like: data(ability.cov) ability.FA <- factanal(covmat = ability.cov, factors = 1) ability.FA (ability.FA <- update(ability.FA, factors = 2)) #summary(ability.FA) round(loadings(ability.FA) %*% t(loadings(ability.FA)) + diag(ability.FA$uniq), 3)

In my function I am trying to return multiple computed items (separated by commas). The function does what I need, but I get a warning message that multi-argument returns are deprecated. Is this a warning I should heed, or is there a more elegant and warning free way of achieving the same end? Thanks --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi All, There were lot of diffrences in the R and SPSS results for Exploratory Factor Analysis.why is it so ?I used standard factor analysis functions like:-- factanal(m, factors=3, rotation="varimax") princomp(m, cor = FALSE, scores = TRUE, subset = rep(TRUE, nrow(as.matrix(m)))) print(summary(princomp(m, cor=TRUE),loadings = TRUE, cutoff = 0.2), digits = 2) prcomp(m, scale = TRUE)

Hi, In a discussion of factor analysis in "Using Multivariate Statistics" by Tabachnick and Fidell, two matrices are singled out as important for interpreting an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with an oblique promax rotation. One is the "structure matrix". The structure matrix contains the correlations between variables and factors. However, these correlations may be

Dear all, i wonder if there?s a command to obtain the actual values of a principal component or a factor (not as.factor, but factanal) . test=princomp(USArrests, cor = TRUE) summary(test) just outputs, standard deviation, Prop of Variance and cumulative proportion of variance. test$loadings offers yet another proportion of variance scheme. why is that? Apart from that: Is there a

Dear list members, I apologize for putting this (probably) very basic question on the mailing list. I have scanned through the R website (using search) but did not found an answer. (code included below) A factor matrix is simply extracted (which can then subsequently be exported using write.table) by FACT$loadings[1:6,]. I would also like to specifically extract and export

Dear Users, I ran factor analysis using R and SAS. However, I had different outputs from R and SAS. Why they provide different outputs? Especially, the factor loadings are different. I did real dataset(n=264), however, I had an extremely different from R and SAS. Why this things happened? Which software is correct on? Thanks in advance, - TY #R code with example data # A little

Dear friends, I'm using R to produce the following Factor Analysis: > matriz.cor<-hetcor(matrix(as.factor(data), ncol=variables, byrow=T))$correlations > factanal(x=data, factors=2, covmat=matriz.cor, scores='regression') Then the screen output shows the following message: Error en factanal(x = data, factors = 2, covmat = matrix, : requested scores without

Dear R Users, I'm wondering how is it possible to get |factor loadings| <1 in factor analysis model (factanal) performing maximum-likelihood estimation. Is it caused by some constraints? If so, what kind of constraints are placed and when (during the estimation or after)? Robert

Hi all, I am using the example on page 737 of "The R Book" by Michael J Crawley, to plot factor loadings against each other (in a multivariate analysis). However the following line code plot(loadings(model)[,1],loadings(model)[,2],pch=16,xlab="Factor 1", ylab="Factor 2") throws an error message "Error in plot.window(...) : need finite

Hi there, Does anyone know how to explicitly refer to the p-value of thet test that the chosen number of factors is significant in a factor analysis. It's not in the list of values for the factanal command output yet it is printed out with the results. Thanks in advance. Wayne Dr Wayne R. Jones Statistician / Research Analyst KSS Group plc St James's Buildings 79 Oxford Street

Dear R-devel list members, Ben Fairbank draw it to my attention that factanal() (in the stats package) doesn't report factor correlations for oblique rotations. Looking at the source, I see that factanal also doesn't save the factor-transformation (rotation) matrix from which these correlations can be computed. I've modified the source, attached below, so that the transformation

Full_Name: Mike Ulrich Version: 2.9 OS: Mac OSX Submission from: (NULL) (69.169.178.34) The help documentation for loadings() lists more then one parameter. The function call only expects one parameter. The digits, cutoff, and sort parameters are not used in the function. ## S3 method for class 'loadings': print(x, digits = 3, cutoff = 0.1, sort = FALSE, ...) ## S3 method for class

Dear all, The 'make check' step fails for the pacakge mva on IBM AIX. The tail of the Rout log file looks like: > for(factors in 2:4) print(update(Harman23.FA, factors = factors)) Call: factanal(factors = factors, covmat = Harman23.cor) Uniquenesses: height arm.span forearm lower.leg weight 0.170 0.107 0.166

I am performing a large (105 variable) factor analysis with factanal, specifying promax rotation. I kow that some loadings over 1.0 are not unsual with that rotation, but I have some as large as 1.2, which seems extreme. I am skirting the assumptions of the model by using responses on a 7-point rating scale as data; I may have to go back and compute polychoric correlations instead of product

Hi, is there any other routine for factor analysis in R then factanal? Basically I'am interested in another extraction method then the maximum likelihood method and looking for unweighted least squares. Thanks in advance Sigbert Klinke

Hello Gluster users: sorry for long post, I have run out of ideas here, kindly let me know if i am looking at right places for logs and any suggested actions.....thanks a sudden power loss casued hard reboot - now the volume does not start Glusterfs- 3.3.1 on Centos 6.1 transport: TCP sharing volume over NFS for VM storage - VHD Files Type: distributed - only 1 node (brick) XFS (LVM)

Dear list members, Could any expert on factor analysis be so kind to explain how to calculate AIC on the output of factanal. Do I calculate AIC wrong or is factanal$criteria["objective"] not a negative log-likelihood? Best regards Jens Oehlschl?gel The AIC calculated using summary.factanal below don't appear correct to me: n items factors total.df rest.df model.df

Dear list members, Could any expert on factor analysis be so kind to explain how to calculate AIC on the output of factanal. Do I calculate AIC wrong or is factanal$criteria["objective"] not a negative log-likelihood? Best regards Jens Oehlschl?gel The AIC calculated using summary.factanal below don't appear correct to me: n items factors total.df rest.df model.df