similar to: Tukey post hoc test for testing interaction between two or more predictors

Dear all, I have a serious problem in applying Tukey post hoc after a repeated measure ANOVA. I followed the suggestions that I found in this help -list especially this one: //[R] Tukey HSD (or other post hoc tests) following repeated measures ANOVA You want to use lme() in package nlme, then glht() in the multcomp package. This will give you multiplicity adjusted p-values and confidence

I am trying to do Tukey HSD comparisons on a repeated measures expt. I found the following example on r-help and quoted approvingly elsewhere. It is broken. Can anyone please tell me how to get it to work? I am using R 2.4.1. > require(MASS) ## for oats data set > require(nlme) ## for lme() > require(multcomp) ## for multiple comparison stuff > Aov.mod <- aov(Y ~ N + V +

Hello, I am trying to determine the most appropriate way to run post-hoc comparisons on my lme model. I had originally planned to use Tukey HSD method as I am interested in all possible comparisons between my treatment levels. TukeyHSD, however, does not work with lme. The only other code that I was able to find, and which also seems to be widely used, is glht specified with Tukey:

Dear list members, I'm running some tests looking at differences between means for various levels of a factor, using Tukey's HSD method. I would like to plot the data as boxplots or dotplots, with horizontal significance lines indicating which groups are statistically significantly different, according to Tukey HSD. Here's a nice image showing an example of such a graphical

Hi everyone, I am fairly new to R, and I am aware that others have had this problem before, but I have failed to solve the problem from previous replies I found in the archives. As this is such a standard procedure in psychological science, there must be an elegant solution to this...I think. I would much appreciate a solution that even I could understand... ;-) Now, I want to calculate a

Hi, I am new to R and I am trying to perform a post hoc tukey test using the multcomp package's ghlt for a lme model. My first attempt at doing so gave me an output, HOWEVER I have tried to do this again, it keeps coming up with the error: (Error in contrMat(table(mf[[nm]]), type = types[pm]) : less than two groups) My model is looking at effect of incubation temperature (3 groups) on

Hi everyone I'm using Tukey HSD as post-hoc test following a lme analysis. I'm measuring hemicelluloses in different species treated with three different CO2 concentrations (l=low, m=medium, h=high). The whole experiment is a split-plot design and the Tukey-function from the package multcomp is suitable for lme-analysis with random factors. The analysis works fine but I get a non

Hi, I'm trying to make sense of the options for multiple comparisons options in R. I've found the following options: pairwise.t.test, which provides standard t-tests, with options for choosing an appropriate correction for multiple comparisons TukeyHSD, which provides the usual Tukey test glht(package multcomp), which provides a variety of options >From the help list, it appears

Hello R experts, I have having a difficult time figuring out how to perform and interpret an ANCOVA of my nested experimental data and would love any suggestions that you might have. Here is the deal: 1) I have twelve tanks of fish (1-12), each with a bunch of fish in them 2) I have three treatments (1-3); 4 tanks per treatment. (each tank only has one treatment applied to it) 3) I sampled

Hi, I have a fairly simple repeated measures-type data set I've been attempting to analyze using the lme function in the nlme package. Repeated searches here and other places lead me to believe I have specified my model correctly. However, I am having trouble with post-hoc tests. From what I gather, other people are successfully using the glht function from the multcomp package to

Hi R users, I sent a message yesterday about NA in model estimates ( http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/How-set-lm-to-don-t-return-NA-in-summary-td3722587.html). If I use aov() instead of lm() I get no NA in model estimates and I use gmodels::estimable() without problems. Ok! Now I'm performing a lot of contrasts and I need correcting for multiplicity. So, I can use multcomp::glht() for this.

Hi Everyone, I’m trying to figure out how to get R to analyze this experiment properly. I have a series of subjects each with two legs. Within each leg there are two bones that I am interested in. There are also two treatments that I am interested in. That results in four different combinations of treatments. Obviously, since the subjects only have two legs, they can’t receive each

Oats[Oats$Variety %in% c("Victory", "Golden Rain"),] or subset(Oats, Variety %in% c("Victory", "Golden Rain")) Stefano -----Messaggio originale----- Da: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch [mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch]Per conto di elyakhlifi mustapha Inviato: luned? 23 aprile 2007 9.56 A: R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch Oggetto: [R] extract from

Dear Colleagues, I fit this model: mod1 <- lmer(x~category*comp+(1|id),data=impchiefsrm) where category has 4 levels and comp has 8 levels. These work: glht(mod1, linfct=mcp(category="Tukey") glht(mod1, linfct=mcp(comp="Tukey") What I'd like is (conceptually): glht(mod1, linfct=mcp(category:comp="Tukey") but it gives a syntax error. Any help is

Greetings, In the following one-way ANOVA I am attempting to calculate the means of each treatment along with their 95% Tukey confidence intervals for the data shown below using a routine from the HH package. library(HH) options(digits=10) # load data treat voltage 1 130 1 74 1 155 1 180 2 150 2 159 2 188 2 126 3 138 3 168 3 110 3 160 4 34

Dear Colleagues, I have scoured the help files and been unable to find an answer to my question. Please forgive me if I have missed something obvious. I have run the following two models, where "category" has 3 levels and "comp" has 8 levels: mod1 <- lmer(x~category+comp+(1|id),data=impchiefsrm) mod2 <- lmer(x~category+comp+category*comp+(1|id),data=impchiefsrm)

Dear R users, this is a follow up of this message http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e6/help/09/05/13897.html I'm reproducing the core of it for convenience. > // > / data(Oats, package = "MEMSS") / > / tp1.oats <- xyplot(yield ~ nitro | Variety + Block, / > / data = Oats, / > / panel = function(x, y, subscripts, ...) { /

Dear all, Can anybody tell me how to export a 3d figure made with the plot3d function? I'm careless about whether it's still interactive or not in another format, as long I can get it out of R. Thanks! Alejandro Gonz?lez Departamento de Biodiversidad y Conservaci?n Real Jard?n Bot?nico Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient?ficas Claudio Moyano, 1 28014 Madrid, Spain Tel +0034

Hi, I am fairly new to R and still trying to figure out how it all works, and I have run into a few issues. I apologize in advance if my questions are a bit basic, I'm also no statistics wizard, so part of my problem my be a more fundamental lack of knowledge in the field. I have a dataset that looks something like this: Week Subj Group Readout 0 1 A 352.2 1 1 A

Hi all,  I was trying to use glht() from multcomp package to construct a contrast on interaction term in a linear model to do some comparisons. I am little uncertain on how to construct contrasts on a 3-way interaction containing a continuous variable, and hope someone can confirm what I did is correct or wrong: The linear model has a continuous dependent variable “y”, with treatment factor