similar to: quite complicated case(the repeated data arranage~)

Hi All I have regression coefficients from an experiment and I want to plot them in lattice using panel curve but I have run into error messages. I want an 3 panel conditioned plot of 2 curves of Treatment 2 in each panel conditioned by Treatment1, the example curve expression is x+value*x^2 A rough toy example to give an idea of what I want is: Data: data = expand.grid(Treatment1 =

Dear R-help, I would like to compute the variance for the proportion of treatment effect by a surrogate in a survival model (Lin, Fleming, and De Gruttola 1997 in Statistics in Medicine). The paper mentioned that the covariance matrix matches that of the covariance matrix estimator for the marginal hazard modelling of multiple events data (Wei, Lin, and Weissfeld 1989 JASA), and is implemented

Dear R users, I have a linear model of the kind outcome ~ treatment + covariate where 'treatment' is a factor with three levels ("0", "1", and "2"), and the covariate is continuous. Treatments "1" and "2" both have regression coefficients significantly different from 0 when using treatment contrasts with treatment "0" as the

Quick question, as I attempt to learn R. For post-hoc tests 1) Is there an easy function that will take, say the results of tukeyHSD and create a grouping table. e.g., if I have treatments 1, 2, and 3, with 1 and 2 being statistically the same and 3 being different from both Group Treatment A 1 A 2 B 3 2) I've been stumbling over the proper syntax for simple effects for a tukeyHSD

Hello, I am performing cor() of some of my data. For example, I'll do 3 corr() (many variables) operations, one for each of the three treatments. I then do the following: i <-lower.tri(treatment1.cor) cor(cbind(one = treatment1.corr[i], two = treatment2.corr[i], three = treatment3.corr[i])) Does this operation above tell me how correlated each of the three treatments is? Because this

I'm looking for a function in R similar to t.test() which was generously pointed out to me yesterday, but which can be used for normally distributed data. To recap yesterday: > x <- scan() 1: 62 52 68 23 34 45 27 42 83 56 40 12: Read 11 items > alpha<- .05 > t.test(x) One Sample t-test data: x t = 8.8696, df = 10, p-value = 4.717e-06 alternative hypothesis: true

Hello, If I have two correlation matrices (e.g. one for each of two treatments) and then perform cor() on those two correlation matrices is this third correlation matrix interpreted as the correlation between the two treatments? In my sample below I would interpret that the treatments are 0.28 correlated. Is this correct? > var1<- c(.000000000008, .09, .1234, .5670008, .00110011002200,

Hi Everyone! I live in Sweden and can not get CallerID to work on analog incoming lines. I m trying to find out if DTMF style CallerID works on a FXO card (X100). I`v seen one solution with a modem attached in parallel with the X100 just to provide the ID on its serial port. It must be much better if this can be implemented in to the X100 driver. Any info about this would be highly appreciated.

On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 12:14 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > Hi! > > > > Since it is a PCIe card, it does not have the ability to host hardware > > > > devices for networking, storage and console. We provide these devices > > > > on X100 coprocessors thus enabling a self-bootable equivalent environment > > > > for applications. A key

On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 12:14 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > Hi! > > > > Since it is a PCIe card, it does not have the ability to host hardware > > > > devices for networking, storage and console. We provide these devices > > > > on X100 coprocessors thus enabling a self-bootable equivalent environment > > > > for applications. A key

On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 14:43 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Since it is a PCIe card, it does not have the ability to host hardware > > devices for networking, storage and console. We provide these devices > > on X100 coprocessors thus enabling a self-bootable equivalent environment > > for applications. A key benefit of our solution is that it leverages >

On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 14:43 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Since it is a PCIe card, it does not have the ability to host hardware > > devices for networking, storage and console. We provide these devices > > on X100 coprocessors thus enabling a self-bootable equivalent environment > > for applications. A key benefit of our solution is that it leverages >

Hello Sudeep Dutt, On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 06:46:08PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 08:31:31PM -0700, Sudeep Dutt wrote: > > An Intel MIC X100 device is a PCIe form factor add-in coprocessor > > card based on the Intel Many Integrated Core (MIC) architecture > > that runs a Linux OS. It is a PCIe endpoint in a platform and therefore > >

Hello Sudeep Dutt, On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 06:46:08PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 08:31:31PM -0700, Sudeep Dutt wrote: > > An Intel MIC X100 device is a PCIe form factor add-in coprocessor > > card based on the Intel Many Integrated Core (MIC) architecture > > that runs a Linux OS. It is a PCIe endpoint in a platform and therefore > >

Hi R experts, I am interested on the effects of two dietry compunds on the growth of chicks. Rather than extracting linear growth functions for each chick and using these in an analysis I thought using ReML might provide a neater and better way of doing this. (I have read the pdf vignette("MlmSoftRev") and "Fitting linear mixed models in R" by Douglas Bates but I am not

Hi, I am trying to use glm to fit my data, wondering if there is a easy way to fit a glm without typing all the explanatory variable names. For example, if I have 100 explanatory variables x1, x2, ..., x100 and response variable is y, I don't want to do something like glm1 <- glm(y ~ x1 + x2 + ... + x100, family = gaussian, data = dataA) since it would be a lot of typing. Many thanks,

I purchased an IAX2 hardphone, X100 otherwise known as a Netweb X100 or YWH100 with a PA168 chip and the latest firmware 1.45 available, from a US retailer. I was able to configure the phone to work with my Asterisk box, except the hold and transfer buttons do not work. When you press the hold button, it rings endlessly, the transfer button, displays "transferring" but it does nothing.

Dear All: I am trying to shade the area between the two lines; *line 1* and *line 2*. You can use this code as an example. x100<-c(-1,1,2,3,4,5,6,3) y100<-c(4,5,3,1,4,4,2,-1) plot(x100,y100) *##### line1* abline(a=-(Beta0-1)/Beta[1,2], b=-Beta[1,1]/Beta[1,2], lwd = 3, col="skyblue", lty=3) ##### lty=3, *##### line 2* abline(a=-(Beta0+1)/Beta[1,2],

Hello I am (attempting) to run the astlinux version of Asterisk on a VIA embedded platform. I have a TDM04B and pretty sure zaptel.conf and zapata.conf setup OK. They worked fine with same card in traditional PC anyway. I think need the module wcfxs for a Digium TDM04B card. Is this module not part of astlinux? Do I need to download it? Or is it in opt? I see wctdm - but think that is

A few weeks ago I reported a problem with model.frame, whose root lay in a formula expression "....+ ratetable(x1=x1, x2=x2, ....x100=x100)" that was really long and caused model.frame to fail. Brian had some indefinite ideas on what might need to change in the base code to handle it. In survival_2.36-1 the bit of code that generated the offending expression has been changed (mostly