similar to: how to find the minimum

Dear all: "predict.glm" provides an example to perform logistic regression when the response variable is a tow-columned matrix. I find some paradox about the degree of freedom . > summary(budworm.lg) Call: glm(formula = SF ~ sex * ldose, family = binomial) Deviance Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -1.39849 -0.32094 -0.07592 0.38220 1.10375

Dear list: After reading the following two links: http://luna.cas.usf.edu/~mbrannic/files/regression/Logistic.html http://www.tufts.edu/~gdallal/logistic.htm I've known the mathematical basis for logistic regression.However I am still not so sure about the "logit " For a categorical independent variable, It is easy to understand the procedures how "log

Dear friends : using the "glm" function and setting family=binomial, I got a list of coefficients. The coefficients reflect the effects of predicted variables on the probability of the response to be "1". My response variable consists of "A" and "D" . I don't know which level of the response was set to be 1. is the first element of the response set

Dear, I am using the R package SNPRelate but I found an error when I run the following command. Do you know what might be the problem? Thanks in advance. > vcf.fn <- system.file("extdata","str.vcf",package="SNPRelate") > snpgdsVCF2GDS(vcf.fn,"test.gds") Start snpgdsVCF2GDS ... Extracting bi-allelic and polymorhpic SNPs.

Dear All, a short and maybe simple question: I have to rank all values in a matrix from 0 to X, [1] [2] [3] [4] [1] 0.1 2 0 3 [2] 50 3 3 1 [3] 100 1 1 0 [4] 100 2 2 0 0->0 0.1->1 2->2 3->3 50->4 100->5 (X=5) is there any function for this? i have looked in several packages (vegan, labdsv etc.) because I am working with species by site tables,

hi, when i change the OBJ_ROOT and recompile the llvm, it's successful. but run following test, then the error occues: ----------------------------------------------------- [yue at RH9 obj]$ make -C ./test/Programs make: Entering directory `/home/yue/llvm/obj/test/Programs' make[1]: Entering directory `/home/yue/llvm/obj/test/Programs/SingleSource' make[2]: Entering directory

I try to run lli with "--load=/lib/libpthread.so", but it shows: --------------------------------------------------- [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll Error opening '/lib/libpthread.so.0': /lib/libpthread.so.0: symbol _errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference -load request ignored. Creating thread 0 WARNING: Cannot resolve fn

On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, yue wrote: > I try to run lli with "--load=/lib/libpthread.so", but it shows: > --------------------------------------------------- > [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll > Error opening '/lib/libpthread.so.0': /lib/libpthread.so.0: symbol > _errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time > reference > -load request

hi, I compile a pthread program using llvmgcc, but when i run pthread.ll, it show: ------------------ [yue at RH9 test]$ llvmgcc pthread.c -o pthread.ll [yue at RH9 test]$ ls pthread pthread.c pthread.ll pthread.ll.bc [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll Creating thread 0 WARNING: Cannot resolve fn 'pthread_create' using a dummy noop function instead! ERROR; return code from

Try llvmgcc pthread.c -o pthread.ll -pthread You have to link in the pthreads library, and I believe -pthread is all you need on a redhat 9 box. Kevin > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of yue > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 11:43 PM > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: [LLVMdev] pthread?

hi, I try to build hello.cpp using both llvmg++ and GNU g++, the generate llvm bytecode's size is about 960K, and the size of binary code generated by g++ is only 13K. Could anyone explain the difference between the two result? BWT: I rebuild the cfrontend in RH linux9.0, but when I build the hello.cpp the llvmG++ reports warnings too, it shows: ----------------------------- [yue at RH9

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 2:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:58:06AM +0800, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > > > Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface > > when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the >

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 2:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:58:06AM +0800, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > > > Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface > > when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the >

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:23 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:59:03PM +0800, Tonghao Zhang wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 2:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:58:06AM +0800, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > > > > From: Tonghao Zhang

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:21 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:39:14AM +0800, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > > > Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface > > when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the >

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:21 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:39:14AM +0800, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > > > Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface > > when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the >

On 2018/07/22 3:04, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be > used for in tx path in the next patch. And with the patch, > qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue. > > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > --- ... >

On 2018/07/22 3:04, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be > used for in tx path in the next patch. And with the patch, > qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue. > > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > --- ... >

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:39:15AM +0800, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > Allow user configuring RXCSUM separately with ethtool -K, > reusing the existing virtnet_set_guest_offloads helper > that configures RXCSUM for XDP. This is conditional on > VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS. > > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:39:15AM +0800, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > Allow user configuring RXCSUM separately with ethtool -K, > reusing the existing virtnet_set_guest_offloads helper > that configures RXCSUM for XDP. This is conditional on > VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS. > > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin